Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Roman empire being a long-lived empire and over a large area is likely to have had some dynasties/emperors that were not ethnically Latin/Italian, is that in fact the case? If so which dynasties/emperors?

share|improve this question

closed as too broad by Sardathrion, Kobunite, Pieter Geerkens, Louis Rhys, Yannis Rizos Sep 28 '13 at 20:16

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
The question was probably not meaningful at the time: for example Maximian came from a family of shopkeepers in Pannonia or perhaps Illyricum (so modern Serbia/Bosnia/Croatia), neither of which were originally Latin but both were very Roman at the time. –  Henry Sep 25 '13 at 8:00
    
@Henry It is true that the races were well-mixed by the time of the late empire, however some emperors, those whose came from more uncouth frontier areas, were perceived as a somewhat different kettle of fish than the run-of-the-mill Roman. Two examples that spring to mind are Maximin the Thracian and Philip the Arab (these are their common historical appellations). –  Felix Goldberg Sep 25 '13 at 9:05
1  
Most of the Emperor of Byzantium. If you include of Holy Roman Empire, then the list goes on and on... –  Sardathrion Sep 25 '13 at 10:15
1  
most of them... –  Louis Rhys Sep 26 '13 at 12:18

1 Answer 1

There is a fine list here: http://historum.com/ancient-history/19034-national-ethnic-origins-roman-emperors.html

During the mid and late periods of the empire most emperors were born outside of Italy most famously of Illyrian origin.

The Byzantine empire(East roman empire) was more Greek than Latin so it is understandable that its emperors were not from Italy.

share|improve this answer
4  
+1. A wee bit more background: During the imperial period eventually most of the manpower for the legions came from Illyria. Anyone who rose through the ranks on merit was thus also quite likely to be Illyrian. Since the Roman armies had a habit of marching on Rome and installing their own generals as Emperor, this would naturally lead to a lot of Illyrian Emperors. –  T.E.D. Sep 26 '13 at 12:34

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.