Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hundreds of years ago, China was more advanced than Europe and even the Ottomans. Why didn't China become a colonial master?

Ming Dynasty Zheng He went on huge shipping expeditions and could have done what the Europeans did to the New World. Most puzzlingly, instead of robbing gold from the weaker countries like what the Spaniards did to the Aztecs, Zheng He did the opposite by presenting gifts of gold to the countries his ships dropped by. Today, the new world has become a extension of old Europe. China is still China.

Did the Chinese make a wrong calculation with their extreme generosity or were they really such magnanimous people?

share|improve this question
To a large extent because the countries they visited had very little that China was interested in. Their main interest was selling things to these countries. They couldn't rob the countries of gold because they didn't have that much, to some extent because they were already using it to buy stuff (like silk) from China. –  Lennart Regebro Sep 28 '13 at 16:12
Not oppressing somebody doesn't make you "magnanimous". It just means you're decent. –  Vector Sep 29 '13 at 4:48

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

One of the major reasons why Spanish invasion of Americas was so successful was that Columbus voyages came just in the right time: Spanish had a huge standing army of war-toughened soldiers with nothing to do, nothing to lose, and eager for adventure.

Serendipitously, in the same year as Columbus discovered America, Spaniards drove Moors out of Iberian peninsula, and suddenly tens of thousands of tough warriors had nothing to do. The war has finished, and the soldiers found themselves with no skills except for war, no family, and no prospects.

And here comes Columbus with the promise of the pagans' lands with unheard of riches, waiting to be conquered by those who are tough enough and willing to take the risks. And the thousands of unemployed soldiers with nothing to lose and nobody to leave behind answered the call.

Apart from this coincidence mounting invasion of the remote continent across the barely discovered waters would be infeasible. It's not easy to find sufficiently many experienced relatively young soldiers willing to drop everything and go into the unknown.

For example, when British joined in they were far less successful, even though the route was more familiar by then: it was too expensive to mount an expedition from a relatively well-to-do society. Therefore the failure of the Roanoke colony. Even then, the first successful settlement by Pilgrims came in the wake of armed religious conflict in their homeland.

IMHO China, as well as most other nations at that time, didn't mount an invasion across the ocean because under normal circumstances the adventure would be prohibitively expensive.

People who have, so to speak, a comfortable middle-class lifestyle and a loving family are less willing to take considerable risks. This makes organizing a large scale expedition into unknown dangerous lands, with very little chance of ever coming back, prohibitively expensive in a thriving society.

share|improve this answer
This answer seems to suggest that were it not for the serendipitous coincidence of events on the Iberian peninsula, the colonization of the Americas might never have happened. This is quite a surprising claim for which I'd be interested to learn more about. –  Kenny LJ Jul 28 at 6:29
@KennyLJ: I don't think it's possible to prove counterfactual claims, other than with the above arguments. –  Michael Jul 28 at 14:45

The Europeans had an advantage over the Chinese, in that they were able in many cases to walk into recently depopulated areas and build their colonies unobstructed. Between 70 and 90 percent of everyone who lived between Point Barrow and Tierra del Fuego died after the arrival of European diseases. In the Spanish colonies the conquistadores arrived following a wave of sickness and death, claiming to represent a vengeful deity which would slay all who did not accept the 'true faith', promising redemption and life for those who accepted.

As the questioner notes, the "the new world has become a extension of old Europe", but then again, Europe has become an extension of the rest of the world. China is still China, and it seems the Chinese are more comfortable with that.

share|improve this answer
Do you have a reference for Spain missionaries using "vengeful deity + disease" in their work? Also, while the impact of pathogens like Smallpox was extensive - this would not have been unique to European visitors. Asian visitors would have had the same result. –  LateralFractal Oct 13 '13 at 6:41
The "70 to 90 percent" figure likewise needs a reference. –  Eugene Seidel Oct 13 '13 at 10:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.