History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

From my knowledge, the habeas corpus can be suspended in times of rebellion and danger of public health and safety. Wouldn't this be ground to ultimately suspend the habeas corpus in Bush's favor? (Suspension Clause found in Article One, Section 9, clause 2).

I'm not siding with either Boumediene or Bush in this case. I'm simply curious as to how this ruling was established.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Lennart Regebro, Kobunite, Sardathrion, Mark C. Wallace, DVK Nov 22 '13 at 16:25

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions on social sciences other than History are off-topic here, unless they also involve history in some fashion. While ethics, archaeology, etc. are all connected to history, each field has their own experts who are better equipped to answer such questions." – Lennart Regebro, Kobunite, Sardathrion, Mark C. Wallace, DVK
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This has nothing to do with history, but is a question of US law. – Lennart Regebro Nov 20 '13 at 6:21
The study of history naturally ventures into many areas, in order to best interpret past events and learn the best lessons for he future. I voted to keep this one open, though I can see it sits in the grey area. – Pieter Geerkens Nov 20 '13 at 21:56

2001-2008 was not a time of rebellion and danger of public health and safety. The arguments of the court can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boumediene_v._Bush#Opinion_of_the_Court

He was not acquitted of his charges, as he was never charged with anything. (That's the whole point, if he had been arrested and charged with something, his habeas corpus would not have been violated).

He was detained because he knew Bensayah Belkacem, who was detained for the heinous crime of making a lot of telephone calls to Afghanistan.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.