History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Some says China invented the printing press.

However, another says that Gutenberg invented the printing press.

Nevertheless, western printing press is superior for 2 reasons

  1. We know Gutenberg name. This is a civilization that remember their inventor. The name of "some chinese" that invent printing press is much less known.
  2. Gutenberg printing press is faster.

So, how much faster?

Is this mainly due to alphabeths or different techniques?

By how much both printing press improve economy?

share|improve this question
While the answers are all good, I am trying to fine one more directly compare European vs Chinese printing. Not before and after Gutenberg. – Jim Thio Dec 13 '13 at 5:38
Extensive rework of a question's existing text is discouraged, as it invalidates answers already submitted in good faith. However, the addition of clarification underneath an Update line is always acceptable, and preferred to clarifying the question in comments. – Pieter Geerkens Dec 13 '13 at 5:55
@JimThio: Well, Pre-Gutenberg printing is Chinese printing. And that means wood-block printing. The East-Asian movable type technology never reached Europe, and wasn't even widespread in East-Asia. So they can't practically be compared. – Lennart Regebro Dec 13 '13 at 9:08
Some says that chinese printers, are also very efficient and more productive than Gutenbergs and produces more pages per day. I forget the source. – Jim Thio Dec 13 '13 at 10:07

Although Gutenberg is justly famous for being the inventor of the Printing Press, the invention itself is grossly misnamed in that appellation. What Gutenberg actually invented, and which changed the world, is the Movable- And Reusable-Type Printing Press.

By devising a system in which mass-produced lead type, cheaply cast in large quantities, could be rapidly set; used for printing; and then disassembled to await the next print job, Gutenberg revolutionized how literature was disseminated.

Prior mechanisms involved the painstaking creation of block text, specific to each print job by master craftsmen. In Gutenberg's new system, only the molds for the typed letters needed to be made by master craftsmen; the type itself could be made by less skilled journeymen.

The speed difference arose from the availability of vast quantities of type, in various font families and sizes, in local print shops. Setting this type could be done by a skilled typesetter at perhaps a quarter the speed of reading it. The actual print runs were comparable, but the typeset was available in hours rather than weeks or months.

The simpler Roman alphabet, compared to those of China and Japan, certainly would have been a motivating factor for Gutenberg's invention, but perhaps simply made the entire notion imaginable. One can start with 52 upper- and lower-case letter, 10 digits, and a few punctuation marks, totaling about 70 molds, compared to a basic vocabulary in Oriental characters of several hundred to a few thousand starting characters.

As noted below moveable-type existed in China for a few hundred years before Guttenberg, but the type characters were individually fired porcelain, thus much more expensive to make than Guttenberg's molded lead type, and not practical for large-scale printing. This reduced their effect on the cost of a book, according to the economic analysis presented by Lennart.

share|improve this answer
There was movable and reusable types in China and Korea before Gutenberg as well. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi_Sheng However, it's doubtful that Gutenberg ever saw one of those, his invention is probably independent. But, we don't really know exactly what Gutenberg invented, and what was invented by those who took up printing directly after him. He does seem to have invented the mass production of led type, but with a quite different technique than used later, possibly sand-casting. infoplease.com/encyclopedia/people/gutenberg-johann.html – Lennart Regebro Dec 13 '13 at 4:10
@LennartRegebro: History is chock-full of simultaneous invention of technology, even over distances much less than the breadth of Eurasia. Interesting point about the sand-casting - I hadn't realized that. Perhaps what Gutenberg really invented was Printing the Bible in a vulgate tongue. – Pieter Geerkens Dec 13 '13 at 4:13
I think you can summarize what he did is to invent processes to make printing books an economically viable alternative to copying by hand. This way the actual technical details which are don't really know, are left out. :-) – Lennart Regebro Dec 13 '13 at 14:21

Before Gutenberg the only practical way to print text in Europe was through wood block printing. You would have to carve one whole page in wood, and print from that. This was slow and error prone, and as a result it wasn't really done much.

So when it comes to the difference in economy, what we need to compare Gutenbergs printing with, is handwritten manuscripts. And the prices for books dropped with c:a 80% in the 50 years that follows Gutenbergs invention.

Before 1450, a book seems to have cost around 2000 day wages. After 1450 most of the recorded prices are below 800 day wages, meaning that printing had a quick impact on book prices. After 1500 prices seem to be below 300 day wages.

I don't know how much the Chinese and Korean printing techniques lowered prices, but considering that the techniques never really seem to have taken off the answer is probably "not enough". This is indeed likely to be to a large extent because of the script.


  • The Welfare Impact of a New Good: The Printed Book - Jeremiah Dittmar 2011 (link)
  • Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous: Living Costs of the Rich versus the Poor in England, 1209-1869 - Gregory Clark, 2004 (link) (Figure 4)
share|improve this answer
Interesting statistics; too long for a comment; not quite an answer to the question. +1 anyways. – Pieter Geerkens Dec 13 '13 at 5:52
@PieterGeerkens Yeah, it only answers part of it, partly because you answered the rest. :-) – Lennart Regebro Dec 13 '13 at 9:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.