Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Secretary of State James Byrnes was a very influential man and played a key role in foreign policy and the negotiations during WW2. It is known that after the death of FDR, he was the one who informed Truman about the Manhattan project and advised him on many issues.

What extent was he involved in influencing Truman to bombing Japan with nuclear weapons? Looking for insights/references/pointers.

share|improve this question
    
I would like to see a bit more effort put into the question, and a narrowing of the question scope. As currently worded it seems too broad to me. –  Pieter Geerkens Dec 14 '13 at 5:41
    
Done. I have asked a specific detail - the decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. –  amarprabhu Dec 14 '13 at 5:46
1  
Hmm how is the chinese invention of the printing press relevant here? I think you pasted the worng link. –  amarprabhu Dec 14 '13 at 6:35
    
Here is a 60-year release from the National Security Archive in 2005 re the Atomic Bomb: www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162 Thank you @amar. –  Pieter Geerkens Dec 14 '13 at 6:41
add comment

1 Answer 1

As a former mentor of then Senator Harry Truman upon his arrival in Washington; FDR's Assistant President for much of WWII; a pre-convention favorite in 1944 to be FDR's running mate; and newly appointed Secretary of State; Jams Byrnes certainly wielded considerable influence with Truman during those summer months of 1945. However it is worthwhile to remember the slogan over Truman's desk for his entire presidency: "The Buck Stops Here". Truman accepted full responsibility for every decision from the Oval Office, and expected to make the final decision on all key government policies.

However, the nature of the allegations made concerning Byrnes' involvement in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki decisions seem to involve more manipulation of Truman than influencing. The distinction I make between these terms is that influencing involves the presentation of all available knowledge accompanied with a strong but balanced argument in favour of a preferred decision; manipulation involves the presentation of only knowledge and evidence in support of the preferred decision, resulting in a biased and unbalanced argument being presented. Byrnes' preference for manipulation rather than influencing of Truman seems to have been the cause of their falling out in 1947. In this light, and given the facts noted in papers such as this one, my conclusion is that Byrnes' engaged in much more manipulation of Truman than influencing of him; but that given his personality, Truman would never-the-less stick by his decision.

Caveat:

Byrnes is noted often for the copiousness and precision of his conference notes, but any notes he may have made on the Atomic Bomb decisions in July and August 1945 seem either not to exist anymore, or to still be classified. As such, we are left with only the published personal recollections of those present during those meetings, always remembering the perils of taking too literally the memories of those who are "remembering with advantages".

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. Byrnes also made several changes to the Potsdam declaration, some of which allegedly would never allow Japan to surrender(The Emperor was granted safety in the previous drafts, Brynes might have removed it). Any comments on that? As that is also another tactical maneuver to use the nuclear weapons by delaying the surrender. –  amarprabhu Dec 14 '13 at 6:33
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.