Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There have always been professional soldiers however during the world wards there were vast conscription to encourage young men to join up for "King and Country".

Presumably there was some sort of financial remuneration for these men? Even if they were kept and fed while they fought they were the primary wage earners for their families. Were (and if so how were) soldiers in the great wars paid?

share|improve this question
2  
Upvoting to offset the downvotes: I think this is a legitimate question. –  Michael Jan 10 at 16:49
1  
The problem is that a quick Google search finds the answer. –  Kobunite Jan 10 at 16:53
    
@Kobunite: The general answer is easy to find, but fine details and specifics are not so readily researched. I believe this question is on-topic as a result. –  Pieter Geerkens Jan 11 at 17:41
    
Can you please clarify what country do you mean? –  Anixx Jan 12 at 6:43

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

All soldiers in all armies were paid during the World Wars, with the sole exception being when prisoners were forced to fight by the people holding them. Conscripts were still supposed to be paid, as far as I've heard.

Now, that doesn't necessarily mean you'd see the money right away, or even at all. Some situations, like being stuck in Bastogne or serving in the Battle of Stalingrad, might limit your ability to receive your earnings for a while, and there are obviously going to be occasional glitches in the system where the payment office thinks you died or something. Plus, civilians fighting to defend their city when it is under siege obviously wouldn't be paid, and I doubt the Germans fighting to defend Berlin saw any money after the collapse of the Third Reich. But even they, in theory, were supposed to be paid.

In fact, I've read some stories about soldiers in certain areas being quite happy with how they were paid: the interviews accompanying the miniseries Band of Brothers, for example, mention that paratroopers were paid double (if I recall) the normal $50 salary of standard infantry soldiers, which motivated a lot of people to sign up for the more dangerous job.

As for how they were paid, that would probably vary from country to country, maybe even from branch to brach, and between the two wars. You'd need to research the specific situation you were interested in for more details.

share|improve this answer
1  
in fact, it gets truly bizarre in that during WW1 at least (maybe WW2 as well) POWs were paid by the country holding them, their payment then being used in part to pay for their accommodations in the POW camp and in part paid out for use to buy luxuries. –  jwenting Jan 14 at 14:43

Here is a pay-scale for British Army junior officers effective on Feb 2, 1940, by experience and commissioned date (Being a British pay-scale, the values are expressed in the contemporary pounds/shillings/pence notation.):

enter image description here

This Answer from Hansard also discusses British Officer's Pay during World War II, in regard to the chart above:

Mr. Law Apart from increments in respect of length of service, differences in the rates of pay drawn by captains arise mainly from the fact that, when the pay scales for the Army were revised in 1925 and 1938, officers already serving were given the option of retaining the old rates, where these were considered to be more favourable. Retired officers and officers of the Regular Army Reserve of Officers were naturally given the same conditions as Regular officers, and officers of the Territorial Army Reserve of Officers the same conditions as officers on the active list of the Territorial Army. My hon. Friend will appreciate that in the circumstances it would not be possible to introduce a standard rate of pay for captains without depriving officers commissioned before 1938 of the rights guaranteed to them under earlier pay scales.

Historical Pay-scales dating back to 1949 for the US Military are also available online.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, Officers would be commissioned, not conscripted and the question is about conscripted men. –  Canageek Jan 17 at 18:40

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.