Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

France and Britain made a secret arrangement called Sykes-Picot. With this agreement the middle-east was divided. I am not sure what is the main reason why they divide it to more then 10 countries. I mean they could divide it only for 2 countries, one for France and one for Britain.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Lennart Regebro, Felix Goldberg, Lohoris, Kobunite, American Luke Jan 26 at 0:45

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Requests for trivia or basic historical facts are off-topic if they can be easily answered by looking up the relevant topic on Wikipedia. We're trying to complement common historical references, not duplicate them." – Lennart Regebro, Felix Goldberg, Lohoris, Kobunite, American Luke
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
I voted to close this, as it doesn't show any previous research. Quick reading on Wikipedia about the agreement or the history of the states involved would rectify the incorrect assumptions. –  Lennart Regebro Jan 25 at 13:18

1 Answer 1

The Sykes-Picot agreement did not divide the middle east into countries, but only into areas of occupation. These areas were French occupation, British occupation, Russian occupation, French protectorate, British protectorate and International zones.

These areas do not correspond with later country borders, so your conjecture that the Sykes-Picot agreement divided the middle east into the current countries is not correct. Both Syria and Lebanon was in the French protectorate, for example, and these states were created by the French, not by the Sykes-Picot agreement.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.