Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

"Class" is a set of connected, but not identical, theoretical approaches to social division in human societies, including past human societies. Historians regularly make use of "class" in their writings, but with so many approaches to "class," how can we tell which approach a historian is using in their writing?

What major approaches to "class" as a theoretical category do historians commonly use?

An ideal answer would outline a summary name for each approach, describe how it approaches class and what class means in this approach, and point to major theoreticians or historians using their approach. A "Heads of Title" approach would be the ideal answer.

An ideal answer would not need to fully specify each approach to class. Hopefully a subsequent series of questions could ask for the use of class in particular ways in historiography if these are of interest.

share|improve this question
1  
What's wrong in your opinion e.g. with, say, Wikipedia's treatment of theoretical models of class? –  Drux Feb 24 at 9:49
1  
Good comment. Wikipedia's article doesn't reflect historiographical uses; is reductionist; generalist; fails to adhere to high quality sources (and thus doesn't meet its own NPOV policy); suffers from NPOV policy; and, going back to the first point, doesn't draw out the peculiarly historical uses of class. I think there's space for this answer largely due to the appalling quality of wikipedia's answer, and wikipedia's inability to write answers on humanities and social sciences theoretical topics at high quality. –  Samuel Russell Feb 24 at 10:08
    
Thx, fair enough. –  Drux Feb 24 at 10:41
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.