History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

After the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq there has been a lot of talking about how many soldiers suffer from PTSD when they return home.

I'm interested in knowing more about war trauma and PTSD in ancient warfare. It would perhaps be useful to narrow it down to the lets say the Roman era.

I imagine that wars back then can be considered more "brutal" than what we have today, most of the fighting happening in very close combat with many dead and dismembered bodies laying around (as opposed to the relatively small engagements modern armies are use to today and of course the fighting parties tend to keep greater distances between themselves nowadays). My initial guess would be that soldiers surviving these engagements would suffer from terrible trauma.

On the other hand, these people would have led more "brutal" lives than we have today. I imagine they would have been exposed to violence at younger ages (crucifixion of criminals, arguments ending up with swords, animal and possibly human sacrifices, more instances of death around them etc...). Additionally I imagine their culture and religions probably prepared them for this level of violence. Compare that with the childhood and the life the average (Christian, religion that doesn't really prepare for war and violence) westerner lives before seeing war for the first time.

I'm particularly interested in knowing if any ancient writers left any records talking about war trauma in soldiers of their time?

share|improve this question
Great question. Perhaps the other question in parenthesis is best edited out- I just feel it dilutes the focus. – Rajib Apr 26 '14 at 2:09
This question appears to be off-topic because it is trivially answered with a Google search. The breadth of results suggests it may be too broad as well. google.com/#q=ptsd+ancient+history – Comintern Apr 26 '14 at 5:24
I believe this question would be improved if it contained less speculation and a tighter focus on the core question – Mark C. Wallace Apr 27 '14 at 13:31
Growing up in the violence of America's public housing projects, extremely poor communities and around addictive behavior produces PTSD symptoms. What's the difference in a child seeing his neighbors and relatives shot or killing themselves in America's streets or in some foreign land. In fact, 18 year old men and women in combat might be better prepared for such trauma. But, we seem willing to blame the poor for their reaction to such traumatic violence, while offering, at least, some support for our veterans. – user15317 Nov 11 '15 at 23:30
up vote 21 down vote accepted

PTSD, or stress reactions from battle, were well known during the Greek and Roman era. The Greeks understood it very well. Alexander the Great's men are said to have mutinied after suffering "battle fatigue."

These examples of Roman era PTSD are taken from a blog of ancient examples sourced from Max Hastings', An Oxford Book of Military Anecdotes:

According to Herodotus, in 480 B.C., at the Battle of Thermopylae, where King Leonidas and 300 Spartans took on Xerxes I and 100,000-150,000 Persian troops, two of the Spartan soldiers, Aristodemos and another named Eurytos, reported that they were suffering from an “acute inflammation of the eyes,”...Labeled tresantes, meaning “trembler,”...

During the Roman siege of Syracuse in 211 B.C., a number of Greek soldiers defending the city were “stricken dumb with terror,” according to Greek historian Plutarch. Surdomutism, which is now recognized as a common conversion reaction to the stress of combat, was first clinically diagnosed during the Russo-Japanese War of 1905.

According to Peter Connolly, the Greek military historian Polybius wrote that as early as 168 B.C., the Roman army was quite familiar with soldiers who deliberately injured themselves in order to avoid combat.

According to The VVA Veteran, a Congressional Organization:

Aristodemos (example above) later hung himself in shame.

It relates the story of another Spartan commander who was forced to dismiss several of his troops in the Battle of Thermopylae Pass in 480 B.C.

"They had no heart for the fight and were unwilling to take their share of the danger.”


The Greek historian Herodotus, in writing of the battle of Marathon in 490 B.C., cites an Athenian warrior who went permanently blind when the soldier standing next to him was killed, although the blinded soldier “was wounded in no part of his body.” So, too, blindness, deafness, and paralysis, among other conditions, are common forms of “conversion reactions” experienced and well-documented among soldiers today

share|improve this answer
Thank you, nice snippets of history there. Just a little thing, when you say Alexander's men mutinied, are you referring to when Alex' wanted to march further into India after defeating Porus? – Juicy Apr 27 '14 at 2:11
Largely, its a picture that seems likely. With the bit about Alexander's troops, there are varying interpretations of the mutiny. However, looking at it with this new lens of PTSD- I don't see why this can't be an equally likely cause. – Rajib Apr 27 '14 at 2:47
The Herodotus example is great, so +1. However, I think the example of soldiers maiming themselves is irrelevant to PTSD - they did it before the battle so we can't call it PTSD. – Felix Goldberg Apr 27 '14 at 15:11
@FelixGoldberg Some people can get PTSD without ever being on the front lines. – Razie Mah Apr 27 '14 at 18:09

The term "PTSD" has no definite meaning. First of all, if sent a bunch of psychologists to the average American high school they could probably find a dozen students with PTSD. Any time you get a lot of people sent to a novel environment you are going to have a neurotic reaction from some fraction of them.

During WWI there was an effect called "shell shock" that results in catatonic oblivion in the victim caused by being subjected to a constant, massive, engulfing threat to kill. This effect is largely a product of mechanized warfare and was not found in ancient times (or even any time previous to WWI for that matter).

share|improve this answer
PTSD has a definition, diagnostic criteria and a treatment protocol (constantly being improved. This answer is an opinion, and is not appropriate for a site that relies on research and scholarship. – Mark C. Wallace Apr 28 '14 at 19:19
Since this has popped up on the review queue (why after so long..?) I want to point out that factual incorrectness is not a valid deletion reason. – Semaphore Nov 13 '15 at 6:15
@Mark That meaning has been extended to cover anything. – D J Sims May 19 at 23:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.