History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've done a bit of searching and was unable to find what I expected to be a simple statistic. By "efficiency" I mean the percentage of the Plutonium in the bomb that actually fissioned.

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

According to the Wikipedia article on Trinity, the estimated yield of the device was between 18 and 20 kilotons from a 6.2 kg plutonium 239 core. Complete fission of Pu-239 yields 19 kilotons per kilogram, giving an efficiency of somewhere between 15% and 17%.

share|improve this answer

For the Hiroshima bomb (Little Boy) with 64kg of Uranium only 700 grams was fissioned, or about 1.09% before the remaining HEU was blown apart.

Interestingly a soil sample survey from Hiroshima in 1983 could no longer detect evidence of Uranium above background levels.

The superiority of using Plutonium came from the fact reactors at Haniford could produce it from un-enriched Uranium. It also made the weapon fail safe.

share|improve this answer
He is asking about the Gadget, not the Hiroshima bomb. – Tyler Durden Jun 19 '14 at 3:49
I am not ignorant of the Trinity test. It is a matter of interest and relevance what the efficiency of the Hiroshima weapon was in relation to the Gadget. I find people with rigid views and strict interpretations of what is relevant, or otherwise, tedious in their lack of imagination. – user2357 Jun 19 '14 at 4:29
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. – Mark C. Wallace Jun 19 '14 at 13:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.