Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Some intercity roads and highways have names (eg. the King's Highway in the Bible and the Appian Way in Rome) and others are named after the place that they go to (Jaffa road in Jerusalem). When did smaller intra city streets first get names? I can think of three different kinds of intra city streets:

  1. Some streets are named after things on that street (Church street) or big landowners to whose property the street goes (Campbell Road in Dallas).
  2. Main streets and Broadways are so named because they were indeed the main street.
  3. Streets like Maple and Elm street that often have nothing to do with Maples and Elms but are named so to give them a name.
share|improve this question
    
What makes you think they didn't have them from the get-go? If there are multiple streets around, people have to have a way to differentiate them in conversation. –  T.E.D. Jul 1 at 13:46
    
they might have had names, but what kinds of names did they have? –  Clint Eastwood Jul 1 at 19:19
1  
@T.E.D. some cultures, especially before the advent of postal services, and some even today, do not use street names. Many footpaths and bicycle paths are unnamed. There are other ways to differentiate streets apart from names: size, shape, orientation, landmarks, where they lead. I would not assume all streets had names from the get-go. –  congusbongus Jul 2 at 1:49
    
Many streets in Tokyo don't have any signs. –  Bruce James Jul 2 at 18:22

1 Answer 1

There are some very old streets in England, the oldest believed to be Vicar's Close in Somerset, from around the 14th century - but that is actually quite modern compared to others.

Pompeii is an obvious example from the 6th-7th century, where the street names were clearly signed. A street plan shows that pretty much all streets and alleys were named.

Ancient streets have been found in Jerusalem, which are thought to have existed from about the 4th-6th century. These have been mapped, which is been used to excavate them at the moment. I don't think it would be that much of a leap to suggest that if the streets had been planned in any way that they would also have been named - if not when they were first created, at least by the time they were mapped. The article that I linked to doesn't mention street names explicitly though, but if places like Pompeii were naming smaller streets, then it would be likely that they were in Jerusalem from at least the 6th century too.

Now, this is where my 'official internet sources' run out. I can't seem to find anything earlier than that. But one observation is that it's human nature to want to name locations and points of interest. If there was not an 'official name', it's likely that the locals would have had a name for certain streets and places anyway. You have already mentioned the reasons why people would do that, but as an example: I live in a village which was bombed during WWII and at the back of the houses on a field is a massive ditch where a bomb fell. The area is just common land and has no name, but local people call that area and the path that runs behind the houses 'The Bomb Hole'. Everyone in the village knows what you mean when you say 'I'm walking down the bomb hole' - you are taking a shortcut down the path next to the common.

So, to directly answer the question - what I can see from sites that exist today, the 6th century seems to be the earliest period where smaller streets were officially named. But saying that, it's likely that smaller streets were named earlier than that, but the maps of the time don't show it - this may say more about the style of the maps than prove that smaller streets were not named (maps of the period seem to show the areas of a city and the major roads, rather than what we would call a street map today).

This is my first answer, so any suggestions welcome. Also, if i'm totally off with this answer then let me know and i'll delete it. Many thanks.

share|improve this answer
    
Good answer. Welcome to the site. –  Mark C. Wallace Jul 1 at 11:03
    
excellent first answer. I await your second. –  Clint Eastwood Jul 2 at 2:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.