Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I found a history book (A History of the Christian Church, Revised Edition by Williston Walker) at my local used book store. It was copyrighted in 1959. Have there been any developments in research since then (new archaeological discoveries, etc) that would be significant enough to motivate me to find a more recent book? How concerned should I be about error or incompleteness in an older history book?

share|improve this question
1  
Old books are dangerous and full of lies. You should only trust recent books that have been written by well-established professors from reputable universities. –  Tyler Durden Aug 4 at 3:23
5  
There was no watermark point of time at which historians suddenly became infallible. Sometimes there is new information available, or somebody had a new idea how to interpret information, that's all. –  S List Aug 4 at 8:55
    
It's a miracle that even if you compare Quran which is written 1400 years ago and compare it with today's is the same. :) –  Noman Aug 4 at 10:01
5  
@TylerDurden and so are most new books. Old books can shed a lot of light on the reasoning and thinking of people in the past, without the politically and religiously motivated censorship and twisting of facts that clouds the objectivity of later sources about the era in which they were written. –  jwenting Aug 4 at 11:07
1  
This depends a lot on what period you are concerned with. The Apostolic, Early Church and Constantinian periods have all had significant even revolutionary new discoveries, new scholarship and new methodologies of interpreting the historical material. The later periods have not had nearly so much re-interpretation. –  RBarryYoung Aug 4 at 13:11

2 Answers 2

up vote 11 down vote accepted

If you are serious about learning the history of Christianity, you should be motivated to find more books period. A single book, especially one attempting to cover a massive subject like Christianity, cannot possibly suffice for anything beyond a cursory read. It will be "incomplete" regardless of how old or new it is, if only because you're fitting thousands of years of history into a single volume.

That said, A History of the Christian Church is a classic that would be 100 years old in four years, and copies are still sold. The author, Williston Walker, was a distinguished theologian at Yale. I would argue there's nothing wrong with reading the book, considering you already have it anyway. You can compare it to later works and see how the perspectives have changed.

As for trusting it and concern about errors: just be aware that not all of this 1959 edition's information will be the most up to date. So if you find conflicting information, you can assess the book's correctness for yourself.

share|improve this answer
5  
There's nothing to give you an appreciation of history better than experiencing the history of the history. –  andy256 Aug 4 at 4:06

Books on the history of Christianity are inevitably influenced by the author’s own religious prejudices. In my opinion the most objective books are those from the end of the 19th century by writers like Wellhausen (Old Testament) and Harnack (early Christianity). At least they treated the subject as a serious historical discipline.

share|improve this answer
2  
and that's independent of when they were written... –  jwenting Aug 4 at 11:10

protected by Yannis Rizos Aug 5 at 9:17

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.