After the bitter partition in 1947, predominant opinion in India is that Jinnah was the sole culprit and thinks of him as a religious person. In fact, the patriarch of the ruling party (BJP) L.K Advani was stripped of his post as party president when on a trip to Lahore he called Jinnah secular. (http://www.economist.com/node/4069498)
However, Jinnah in his address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan said
In course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus, and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State.
You are free. You are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this state of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed - that has nothing to do with the business of the state. BBC World News
Is it possible to arrive at a definite conclusion keeping emotions/bias at bay?