Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My question is simple.

What factors prevented Canada to become a power like UK or France?

Or even Germany/Italy/Spain?

share|improve this question
Germany did emerge as a power twice, but it was defeated twice. Italy? As Bismarck said, Italy has a large appetite, but not the teeth to eat. Spain? It was, then it was destroyed by inflation. –  Russell Feb 21 '13 at 8:49
You don't think Canada is a world power? During what time period? How are you measuring "power"? Too many unknowns. I respectfully submit that Canada exerts more world power than Italy does, and quite possibly Spain. No disrespect to any of the countries. –  Mark C. Wallace Feb 22 '13 at 17:59

2 Answers 2

Until very recently Canada was a much smaller (population-wise) concern than the UK or France. Today those two countries are in the top 25 in population (65 mil and 62 mil), whereas Canada only has 34 million, about the same as Iraq. This is actually a pretty good relative improvement for Canada though. They didn't even break 15 million until around 1960. At that time, the UK had 52 million (and that number was much more impressive than today).

enter image description here

Heck, Greater New York City is only a bit smaller at roughly 22 millon.

share|improve this answer
The current population of Netherlands is 16 million and historically, the Dutch have been much more important than Canada. –  Opt Apr 17 '12 at 23:57
@Sid, I totally agree. –  BROY Apr 20 '12 at 7:49
@T.E.D., I think your theory is not correct. –  BROY Apr 20 '12 at 7:49
@Sid That's not a terribly convincing example. The Netherlands are very much a special case, since it's a small country (in terms of area), so the population has grown much more slowly than elsewhere, and their historical importance dates back to before Europeans had even settled in Canada, when their population wasn't so disproportionately small. –  Jefromi Jan 23 '13 at 23:26
@Jefromi: The Dutch population in the 1600s was ~1.7 million (faculty.history.wisc.edu/sommerville/351/dutch%20republic.htm) while England's was ~5 million (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…) - slightly better ratio ~(3:1 vs 4:1) than today but not too different. The Mughal Empire's (India) population was ~150 million (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire). I'm not saying population isn't important - I mean, if you have a population of say 1000, you're not going to have any relative importance but it's not the sole factor –  Opt Jan 24 '13 at 4:00

Canada is part of the G-7. (Along with Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the U.S.) In this regard, Canada IS a world power.

But not all world powers are in the G7. (Russia, China and India come to mind).

share|improve this answer
Not all powers on the G-7 are world powers. –  Russell Feb 21 '13 at 8:53
@Russell: I'd put it a bit differently. Not all world powers are part of the G7. (Russia, China, and India come to mind.) But Canada is part of a group alongside other world powers as defined by the OP (UK, France, Italy, Germany), all of which are in the G7. –  Tom Au Feb 22 '13 at 17:20
makes sense, I guess I could have phrased it with a bit more diplomacy. –  Russell Feb 23 '13 at 0:39
@Russell: You may have been thinking, there are some Asian nations that are more obvious world powers that are not in the G7. My earlier comment and the edit to my answer addressed this point. –  Tom Au Feb 23 '13 at 23:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.