Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently found out that most of the European monarchies have the same kind of lion in their flag. As you can see it is a lion with a strange long tongue:

Netherlands

Netherlands

United Kingdom

United Kingdom

Prince of Wales

England

Spain

Spain

Norway

Norway

Denmark

Denmark

Luxembourg

Luxembourg

Sweden

Sweden

Now, of course the lion has always (since when to be precise?) been seen as the king of the forest, and in general an animal representing strength. So it makes sense to use it on a monarchy's flag, But my question is

Why do all these monarchies have the same lion in their flag?

It looks like they all come from the same source. Does anybody know what this common source could be?

Here somebody proposed that the rampant lion was a good choice simply because it fit the shields well. Personally I don't really agree with this point of view... many other designs can fit a shield perfectly!

share|improve this question
1  
The one labelled England above is the coat of arms of the Prince of Wales! It's based on the arms of the United Kingdom. –  Steve Melnikoff Jun 12 '12 at 12:02
    
but not the Hellenes ( Greeks )!! upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/95/RoyGrec.png We had Hercules!Gotya! –  hephestos Jun 21 '12 at 21:28
add comment

3 Answers 3

They don't all seem to be the same lion. Spain and Denmark's lions aren't even yellow. This is another rendering of the Coat of Arms of Sweden:

Coat of arms of Sweden

Compare it with the Coat of Arms of the Netherlands. Notice the similarities between the lions. Much of the similarities between these different lions could be because the same artist drew them. By this, I do not mean the originals. The copies can have great variances in details if they remain depicting the same objects. You explained yourself why many display lions:

Now, of course the lion has always (since when to be precise?) been seen as the king of the forest, and in general an animal representing strength. So it makes sense to use it on a monarchy's flag.

However, the position of the lion is very important. See this page. For example:

  • the Netherlands coat of arms has two lions facing inward in the Rampant attitude as supporters
  • the English coat of arms has one lion lion on the dexter side in the Rampant Gardant attitude as a supporter
  • the Spanish coat of arms has one lion in the Rampant attitude as a charge
  • the Norwegian coat of arms has one lion in the Rampant attitude holding an axe as the charge
  • the Danish coat of arms has three lions in the Passant attitude
  • the Luxembourger coat of arms has two lions Rampant Regardant attitude with forked tails. It also has a red lion as the charge in the Rampant attitude.
  • the Swedish coat of arms has two lions Rampant Regardant attitude with forked tails

However, there are various reasons how so many came to be depicting lions in general (besides what you stated). For example, the lion in the Netherlands coat of arms is from the Dutch Republic Lion. The Dutch Republic Lion came from the Duchy of Brabant coat of arms. The Lion on the Duchy of Brabant coat of arms is now also present on the coat of arms of Belgium. This is one example of two or more coats of arms (or parts of coats of arms) coming from one source.

To sum it up, many of the lions you showed just aren't the same. Lions in different attitudes are seen as distinctly different lions. However, in some cases, they came from a common source. Because the lion was seen as the king of the beasts since the Stone Age, at least, it was a common charge (or supporter). Thus, the fact that two coat of arms have lions on them does not necessarily mean both came from the same source (although it could).

share|improve this answer
2  
All the lions have their tongue sticking out though which seems like an unusual similiarity –  Opt Jun 10 '12 at 20:15
2  
I've always been under the impression it was just to look strong and fierce. Many other animals in heraldry have their tongues sticking out also. –  American Luke Jun 10 '12 at 20:24
    
Hi Luke, thank you very much for the informations you provided! However I don't agree with you when you say "To sum it up, many of the lions you showed just aren't the same". They are indeed the same, but in different variants. This thing is quite fascinating to me –  Abramodj Jun 11 '12 at 1:17
    
I was referring to the attitudes. Each attitude had a different meaning. This factor differentiated between different coats of arms with similar animals. As you said, "They are indeed the same, but in different variants." The attitude was much more important when these were created than it is now. When I made that statement, it was from a historical point of view. I hope this clears things up. –  American Luke Jun 11 '12 at 1:37
1  
If you look at the Russian Empire's coat of arms, you will see that the eagle has a similar long tongue: images.vector-images.com/102/russia1883_coa_n90.gif –  Anixx Jun 11 '12 at 7:51
show 1 more comment

European monarchies are extremely intertwined, all European dynasties are related to each other, it's not surprising that they use very similar symbols. For example, take a look at the family tree of the German monarchs:

Monarchs of Germany

Looking at that royal mess, and considering the hereditary nature of heraldry, I think it's quite obvious how we ended up with only two main symbols of European monarchy, the lion and the eagle. That said, and while the choice of the eagle is easily explained, the lion is a bit more enigmatic and I don't think we can do much more than speculate.

The use of lions might have been widespread in the House of Normandy, and the first known use of the lion in coat of arms in a hereditary fashion comes from one of the dynasty's members, Henry I of England. When Geoffrey V, Count of Anjou was knighted in 1127, according to Wikipedia:

He [Henry] placed to hang around his neck a shield painted with golden lions

When Geoffrey V died in 1151 an enamel effigy showing three lions was placed on his tomb. A very similar effigy was placed on the tomb of Geoffrey's grandson, William Longespée.

Enamel effigy of Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou on his tomb at Le Mans Cathedral William Longespée's effigy

It's quite possible that Henry I also used the lion as his symbol, and by passing it on to his son-in-law Geoffrey unwittingly created the tradition of hereditary coat of arms. Henry II of England, Geoffrey's son, also adopted the lion, and according to Wikipedia:

He was probably the first king of England to use a heraldic design: a signet ring with either a leopard or a lion engraved on it. The design would be altered in later generations to form the royal seal of England.

His son, Richard I of England (Richard the Lionheart) formally adopted the three lions from his grandfather's shield as the Royal Arms of England. Political alliances (this was after all the time of the Crusades), intermarriages, and conquests all played a part in the symbol, in one form or another, finding its way to most European coats of arms.

Still, the question remains: Why a lion? It can be speculated that it's an early Christian symbol (see: Daniel in the lions' den), or just a widespread symbol of bravery, as it has been used in similar fashions by several civilizations, some decisively non Christian and with little contact with the Christian world at the time (for example the Han Dynasty's guardian lions). The legendary Hercules could also be the source of the using the lion as a symbol of bravery, his first labour being slaying the Nemean Lion (and then fashionably wearing its skin as a hat ;)

Lastly, a fascinating opinion is that the lion became widely associated with knighthood and chivalry in the 1170s because of the popularity of Chrétien de Troyes' romance Yvain, the Knight of the Lion, that influenced later works of Arthurian legend all around Europe, like Iwein and Owain, or the Lady of the Fountain.

share|improve this answer
add comment

In short, it's a Christian symbol loaded with meaning, and the symbol of the Lion representing royalty [goes back even further than that.] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_(heraldry)#Long_history_of_lion_imagery)

1) It's representative of God, indicating that God is King, and also emblematic of heavenly favor for the monarchy.

2) The lion was considered king of all the beasts, a royal symbol if ever there was one.

3) In pre-modern times, among other things, it was believed that Lions slept with their eyes open - a lion is always watchful over its domain, and so it is with the monarchy it represents.

I don't think a lion was mandatory for royal heraldry, but it's easy to see why it was so popular.

share|improve this answer
    
That's a very speculative answer, and your one source is... well... let's just say not stellar. –  Yannis Rizos Dec 4 '12 at 10:07
    
You want more and better sources, you say? Edited. –  RI Swamp Yankee Dec 4 '12 at 13:04
add comment

protected by Community Dec 4 '12 at 12:45

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.