History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Though the first Transcontinental Railroad was finished in 1869, the Overland Route seems to have only taken passengers between San Francisco and Council Bluffs, Iowa / Omaha, Nebraska via the Overland Flyer. Was there ever a train that ran straight from San Francisco to New York City, or for that matter, from any city that could be considered decidedly on the Pacific to one that sat on the Atlantic?

share|improve this question
Do you mean without any intervening stops in other cities? – ihtkwot Jun 25 '12 at 4:27
If you mean as a regular line I don't think so, I've never encountered mention of one when looking at railroad history and how the train lines were connected prior to and post Civil War era. I guess it would also define what you mean as "single train" and running "straight". – MichaelF Jun 25 '12 at 11:52

I guess the first one could be the Pullman's promotional train of 1870. It started from Boston on May 23rd, 1870, went to San Francisco and then back to Boston, completing the round-trip on July 1, 1870. It was not a regular line. Specifically built for the trip, it took 130 passengers, mostly wealthy members of the Boston Board of Trade with families.

http://cprr.org/Museum/Trans-Continental/index.html - the newspaper published aboard this train

Edit: Obviously, it had stops on the way!

Edit2: I understand the question is about the single train, and not concerned if the train continuously went all the way on the tracks (without a ferry).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.