Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When looking at the United States Declaration of Independence its easy to notice that John Hancock's signature is more prominent than the others: Declaration of Independence From my readings I know John Hancock did sign one of the published copies later, and being the first his was more prominent - and this size difference may be due to the fact it was printed rather than signed. Some of the other signatures seem grouped such that they might have been signed at different times as well, how were the signatures added to the Declaration and was the printing process involved in their differences and groupings?

share|improve this question
    
Actually, not a bad question at all. If you've ever seen an office birthday card, the signatures aren't nearly this organized. –  T.E.D. Jun 27 '12 at 14:14

1 Answer 1

up vote 32 down vote accepted

John Hancock was the President of Congress. So, as stated, he signed first and largest. In the leftmost block are the signers from Georgia. In the block immediately to the right of that one are the signers from North Carolina. The block below contains the signers from South Carolina. This pattern continues throughout with a few exceptions. Here is a visualization:

Labeled Signatures

Two exceptions: John Hancock, although from Massachusetts, did not sign with the rest of the Massachusites as he was the President of Congress. Also, Matthew Thornton did not sign with the rest of the New Hampshirites.

"Because of a lack of space, Thornton was unable to sign next to the other New Hampshire delegates; he instead placed his signature at the end of the document, on the lower right." -Wikipedia

The blocks are also categorized. Start at the leftmost column and go to the rightmost column. Begin with the bottom of each list: Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire (we skip Matthew Thornton's Signature here). This is roughly the order of the colonies, going South to North along the Atlantic Coast.

So, to sum it up, for the most part, the signers signed with the rest of the signers from their respective state.

share|improve this answer
3  
Wow...very cool. That makes sense when you look at it this way. Thanks! –  MichaelF Jun 27 '12 at 19:03
    
Probably the states started filling in below Hancock, then to the right until they ran out of room, then the two Carolinas and Georgia last. –  Oldcat Nov 7 '13 at 18:43
1  
Is that just speculation? –  American Luke Nov 7 '13 at 23:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.