Tell me more ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 13 down vote favorite
1

I've been reading Harold McGee's fascinating On Food and Cooking, and the chapter on alcohol has some interesting historical notes. He describes the widely varied and creative methods used in various cultures to produce alcoholic beverages from available ingredients: wine in the Mediterranean, beer in the Middle East and later in Europe, sake and other rice wines in East Asia, and so on.

It got me wondering:

Which cultures did not historically have a traditional method for producing alcohol?

For instance, I am not sure that pre-Colombian North American cultures knew about alcohol. Is there any evidence one way or the other? (In South America, the Inca had chicha.)

I am most interested in cultures where alcohol was (effectively) unknown. I am less interested in cultures where it was known but forbidden or discouraged (Islam, for example).

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 11 down vote

These did not have indigenous alcoholic beverages, aiming to be as exhaustive as possible:

share|improve this answer
This is great! Thanks so much for the references. – Nate Eldredge Aug 2 '12 at 13:49
4  
@Canageek Inuit is scarcely better, as it excludes the Yupik; it would be a bit like saying English to mean British. It has replaced Eskimo in Canada because Canada conveniently does not have a significant Yupik population. – choster Aug 9 '12 at 21:09
4  
@Canageek "Eskimo" is only considered pejorative in Canada, based on a disputed etymology of the word. In Alaska "Eskimo" is not considered pejorative and means the collection of both Inuit and Yupik peoples. And on top of that, there are also the Aleut, who may or may not have been meant to be included by the use of "Eskimo" in the Hornsey source. Unless the source is specific enough to re-derive the indicated group(s), cites of it should use "Eskimo", probably with scare quotes. – SevenSidedDie Aug 10 '12 at 7:48
2  
Ugh... I would rather use racist term, than FALSELY suggest that some information is sourced when it isn't. Current source says "Eskimo", so if you say "Inuit" please reference some other source or leave it unreferenced. – kubanczyk Aug 26 '12 at 13:56
1  
@Canageek - you do realize that many non-US cultures offucially call them Eskimos in their native language, right (e.g. in russian). Let's tone down on useless political correctness. – DVK Mar 15 at 17:07
show 6 more comments
up vote 2 down vote

I've heard before that the reason that many Native Americans are alcoholics is because they didn't have alcoholic beverages, and thus they didn't build up a resistance to it. I don't know how true that is.

As for people not knowing anything about alcohol, there was this one instance in New Guinea during WWII where a C-47 crashed into an unkown valley, where the inhabitants didn't have any knowledge of alcohol. The book Lost in Shangri-La which tells the story of the event states that as part of an airdrop "...alcohol had enetred Shangri-La for the first time in recorded history"(pg 226). At that point, the valley had somewhere in the realm of 80-100,000 people in it, so while completely isolated still had a significant number of people.

share|improve this answer
1  
New Guinea is an interesting story, just because its highlands held a huge agricultural popuplation mostly cut off from the rest of the world by impassible tropical jungle near the coasts. It wasn't until the advent of air travel that anybody realized there were civilizations in there. Still, the potato made it in there from South America somehow... – T.E.D.♦ Jul 30 '12 at 19:20
I heard the same about Yakuts and other indigenous peoples of Russian Far East and North. – Anixx Mar 15 at 14:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.