History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm doing some research for a small project, and am having some difficulty finding information on telegraphists as a whole.

The information I'm trying to find is rather specific, and I can't seem to find it anywhere.

In the 1950s, how much would a telegraphist have been paid? I realize that at the time, telegraphy unions were forming, so if some specificity is needed, I'd like to know:

  • What a railroad telegrapher's average pay was before railroad telegraphers' unions, and
  • what it was after unions began fighting for higher pay,
  • what it was in the U.S. military (specifically, in the Navy, if it matters).

I realize these are somewhat specific questions - however, I have no clue where to look to find this information. If anyone could help, it would be appreciated!

share|improve this question
up vote 43 down vote accepted

An enlisted Naval serviceman was paid anything from $80 to $213/month, depending on rank and service. I can't find a clear US record, but the Canadians had the lowest (non-training) telegraphist grade as an Able Seaman, and this seems to be at the E-3 level; so by analogy say $100/month. To make it directly comparable to civilian pay we need to account for board and lodging; where the Navy didn't provide these our E-3 would get an allowance of $45 (lodging) and $2.25/day (food) - so say $112.50 allowance, for a total of $212.50.

This report will contain more information than you could possibly want on wages by grade & year for Western Union employees, including discussion of the major pay discussions. Based on Table 2a, a mid-range morse telegraphist could expect $1.24/hour in 1948, $1.41 in 1951, and $1.54-1.69 by 1953.

As an aside, it's worth bearing in mind that unionisation in the industry seems to have begun well before the 1950s (there's some fairly extensive discussion here), so the postwar activity won't reflect the improvement over an entirely non-unionised starting point.

So, how do they compare? In the Navy, assuming he had to find his own bed and board, he'd get $212.50, plus $9 sea pay if applicable, and a further $45 hazardous-duty pay if he did submarine or aviation duty. Or, he could go into civilian work and get about $230/month (five days a week for eight hours at a time), more with overtime or longer hours (not sure if a five, six, or five-and-a-half-day week was standard then). Civilian pay looks a bit better, but not overwhelmingly so.

share|improve this answer
5  
I am... actually flat-out dumbstruck that you managed to find this information so quickly. Thank you so much. – Emrakul Jan 20 at 22:16
1  
@Emrakul no problem, I like a challenge :-) – Andrew Jan 20 at 22:20
    
$212.50 a month would be equivalent to $2,089.88 a month today, according to data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/… – user16106 Jan 21 at 1:46
2  
Hmm, sea pay and submarine pay while not having a navy provided room and board, that would suck. "Hey buddy, shift's over, go outside" – Sam Jan 22 at 15:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.