History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Lawsuits against the federal government can be dismissed under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. For example, Al Haramain Islamic Foundation v. Obama was recently dismissed (Appeals court dismisses warrantless wiretapping suit). The constitution refers to the "immunities of citizens" but not to "sovereign immunity".

Was federal sovereign immunity in place from the beginning? Was it established by a particular court ruling, or was it understood to be in effect (e.g., due to common law precedent)? Has there ever been a significant controversy over federal sovereign immunity?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Sovereign Immunity was there from the beginning. In fact, the very first constitutional ammendment that was passed after ratification (the 11th) was designed to tweak it a bit.

It was a principle brought over from English law, although it actually applies in many countries around the world, particularly constitutional monarchies.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.