Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the last couple of days, the press has been granted much greater freedoms in Burma. They held elections last year and even released Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest (only a year or 2 after they extended it because some nutjob broke in uninvited).

What (or who) prompted the sudden wave of reforms? The Wikipedia page on said reforms doesn't really say much about the motivations of the ruling junta, or even their current status. And they were happy carrying out repression for 50 years previously

share|improve this question
    
Since Myanmar does not allow free media, it might not be possible to give a balanced answer as of now. –  Arani Aug 26 '12 at 15:55
    
The question isn't about free media. I gave increased media freedoms as an example of the reforms that have been going on (like having multi-party elections, releasing Suu Kyi etc.) in the last couple of years. And nothing I can find online explains why these things have started happening. It seems sudden, but such things rarely are and there's always a deeper reason –  Jayraj Aug 27 '12 at 18:18
    
What I meant was that with the foreign media not being allowed to investigate, it is difficult to analyze the actual situation on the ground and understand why these changes have occurred. Unless some study by neutral observers is done, it is difficult to predict the actual reasons. –  Arani Aug 27 '12 at 19:43

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I found an interesting article that discusses this topic, and I believe it provided a pretty realistic explanation for this. Basically, it stated that the economic and diplomatic sanctions placed on Myanmar by the West had a major impact. The reasoning is not that the rulers of Myanmar particularly cared about the impact of said sanctions on the citizens as much as themselves. It suggests that those people who became rich through their involvement with the government had few places to invest their ill-gotten gains because the West is effectively closed off to them.

share|improve this answer
    
Nice! Finally, an answer! –  Jayraj Sep 24 '12 at 20:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.