History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

During 1956-1960 all artels (cooperative enterprises) were nationalized in USSR. It was a large amount of artels.

How easy was it to organize an artel before that, in the post-war period of 1945-1956?

What was the amount of paperwork? What were the typical constraints?

share|improve this question

Well, the accounts claim one could get all necessary papers for an artel in just one day. The management of the artel should be elected by the employees. By the 1941 enactment the new artel was for two years exempt from most taxes and state price control, except that the prices should not exceed the state prices more than 10-13%. Artels were allowed to buy raw materials by fixed prices.

Overall by the beginning of 1950s there were 114000 artels with about 2 million employees. They made up to 6% of GDP, including 40% of all furniture, 70% of metallic tableware, more than a third of knitted wear and hosiery, nearly all toys.

Artels owned about a hundred of R&D bureaus, 22 testing labs and two research institutes.

Artels pioneered production of the Soviet lamp-based radio receivers and CRT televisions.

During the war artels produced weapons and ammunition such as Sudayev machineguns and artillery shells.

share|improve this answer
1  
Hmm. I don't suppose you could provide links for some of those GDP numbers? I believe you, but I'm really curious how they came up with them. I'd think good GDP numbers would be very difficult to come by for Communist "managed" economies, as the market value of most goods, services, and labor isn't really known. – T.E.D. Oct 4 '12 at 14:17
1  
@T.E.D. I think it is much easier to count GDP in planned economies than in market ones. Of course in the result one comes to different numbers though. One of the methods to count GDP is by summing up the wages. Another method is to count the surplus value. – Anixx Oct 4 '12 at 15:09
1  
@T.E.D. For GDP it does not matter how much the production costs "on the black market". What means is for what it was sold actually, what was the self-cost or what the wages were paid (depending on the three methods of finding GDP). The same goes for capitalist economy: production of drugs or weapons by a legal enterprise that may cost enormous money on the black market is accounted for only by its legal selling price. Otherwise you should account for enormous price of say nuclear weapons in the black matrket :-) – Anixx Oct 4 '12 at 17:44
1  
@T.E.D. Similarly GDP can rise and fall with changed prices at the exchange. – Anixx Oct 4 '12 at 19:07
1  
@Felix Goldberg "In the post-war time development of artels was considered an important state task. Here are the memoirs of a manager of a large and successful artel, communist, front soldier. He was tasked to organize an artel in a small town where he was living. He went to raion center, in one day solved all questions and came back to home with some tens of papers and a stamp of the new artel". This is from article by A.K.Trubitsyn. It seems that he was tasked by the party. – Anixx Dec 2 '12 at 10:07

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.