History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Was there ever a society in which sex was viewed either as a functional necessity, duty before the gods or pleasure without any admiration of love?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Samuel Russell, Semaphore, andy256, CGCampbell, Mark C. Wallace May 12 '15 at 8:17

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions on social sciences other than History are off-topic here, unless they also involve history in some fashion. While ethics, archaeology, etc. are all connected to history, each field has their own experts who are better equipped to answer such questions." – Semaphore, andy256, CGCampbell, Mark C. Wallace
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I would assume that orthodox religious societies e.g. in Christianity (such as the Amish or Hutterites) and Judaism may come close to viewing sex as duty before the gods, but then I may be wrongly prejudiced as an outsider. – Drux Oct 22 '12 at 17:08
@Drux: Nope, I think you're more or less right! I can speak from knowledge of the Catholic faith at least. In reality, many Catholic lay folk would not have viewed it in this narrow manner, for obvious/natural/human reasons, though it has been the official doctrine since the Early Church, I'd imagine. – Noldorin Oct 22 '12 at 23:32
@Drux - way way false for Judaism though. Romantic love is fully theologically approved of as foundation of family dynamic. Google "Song of Songs" :) – DVK Nov 3 '12 at 22:57
Also, "admiration of love" seems way way subjective to be answerable. VTC. – DVK Nov 3 '12 at 22:58

The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement would answer your question in the affirmative, however, it is not a society per se, and it doesn't advocate against sex, but rather it advocates against procreation. I think that ultimately sex is viewed by nearly all human groups as being a necessary part of existence.

share|improve this answer
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, on the other hand, welcomes all "into the loving embrace of His Noodly Appendage." :) – Drux Oct 24 '12 at 5:06
-1. First, it is not a society in the sense I was asking about. Second, this is plainly incorrect, according to their website it does not follow from their ideology that they have any special position about love. – Anixx Nov 28 '12 at 20:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.