Tell me more ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The USA (GE, Pratt & Whitney), Russia (NPO Saturn, Klimov), France (Snecma) and the UK (Rolls Royce) are the only countries that have aircraft jet engine manufacturers. What factors might contribute to the reasons that there are no German, Canadian, Israeli, Spanish or Italian companies doing this?

I heard the allied countries of WW2 captured German engineers and developed their industries.

Is there any documentation in the final treaties to indicate that this might be connected to WW2 somehow?

share|improve this question
It is not necessarily the question of being able to, but also of willing to invest the money to bother doing so when buying from those listed is cheaper. – DVK Nov 3 '12 at 21:07
Agree with @DVK. And in the case of Germany, it should probably be 'no longer bother', as they had the first working jet fighter aircraft – Clockwork-Muse Nov 5 '12 at 20:55
3  
List of aircraft engine manufacturers - The list isn't as limited as you seem to think. A prominent example is Kawasaki Heavy Industries (since you seem to imply that the losing side of WW2 somehow stopped producing jet engines). – Yannis Rizos Nov 7 '12 at 22:21
1  
@YannisRizos You might want to consider converting your comment to an answer. I'd upvote it. – Luke Nov 10 '12 at 1:59
1  
@YannisRizos and partially Luke, the list of aircraft engine manufacturers is not the same thing as the list of aircraft jet engine manufacturers. Jet engines are much harder to produce and are also more costly to produce, and so it would be inaccurate to use the list you mentioned. – Reliable Source Nov 28 '12 at 1:11
show 3 more comments

closed as off topic by Luke, Russell, Yannis Rizos, coleopterist, choster Dec 4 '12 at 14:58

Questions on History Stack Exchange are expected to relate to history within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.

2 Answers

The premise of your question is false. Here's a brief (and incomplete) list of current jet engine manufacturers:

I have no idea why jet engine manufacturing (or lack of) would be connected to WW2, at least in the way you seem to imply. In any case, several companies that are based in the losing side of WW2 are key players in aerospace and if they build rockets, satellites and space station components, who cares if they are building jet engines or not.

share|improve this answer

It takes a huge investment to design and build a jet engine plant - at least for cutting edge large passenger jet engines. Even if you did manage this how would you get any customers?

The buyers for your jet engines, the airlines, want to save money but most of all want reliablilty. If you manage to buy an engine for a 747 for $1M less than Rolls-Royce/GE and one fails, potentially causing an accident - your airline is probably out of business. It's the same reason there isn't a cut throat market for pacemearkers or ejection seats.

Since it's so difficult to enter the market you are left with the company that invented the jet engine and an american competitor who was given the designs as part of WWII cooperation.

All the other makers are either subsidised for military/political independance for their home market or make a small range of relatively simple engines.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.