Tell me more ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've always been fascinated by the figure of Alexander the Great, due to his achievements even though he was really young at the time.

There is an episode that I've heard about his early life which I can't confirm on the internet, so I thought of asking here.

From what I know, when Alexander fully earned his throne, the other poleis started to have rebellious thoughts since he was just a kid/young man, underestimating him. As a response Alexander, destroyed a single city as an example, proving that he wasn't just a kid and that he knew how to control his reign.

Is this historically accurate or just a legend that "improves" its figure in history?

share|improve this question
1  
Good question, and welcome to the site! – Steven Drennon Nov 27 '12 at 13:59
Alexander was born into the helm of the ancient world's mightest military machine, and just piloted it competently for a few years. To my mind the more interesting person is is father Phillip, who built the machine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_II_of_Macedon – T.E.D. Nov 27 '12 at 14:34
@StevenDrennon Thank you! :) – Alenanno Nov 27 '12 at 16:29

3 Answers

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Actually, it wasn't intended specifically to set an example, but it did serve to deliver a message that he was not someone who was going to just go away. Alexander's father, Phillip, was murdered in 336 BC, leaving Alexander to rule in his place. Many states, including Thebes and Athens, rose up in revolt when they heard the news. Alexander responded immediately by taking a cavalry force of 3000 men to put down the revolt.

Alexander and his cavalry was able to surprise the city of Thessaly, resulting in their surrender and also resulted in the Thessalians joining Alexander's cavalry. From there he advanced on Thermopylae and Corinth, and then Athens settled for peace. While he was in Corinth, Alexander was given the title of "Hegemon", or leader, of the Greek forces against the Persians.

From here, Alexander had to move north and put down an uprising in Thrace and then Illyria before he could feel copmfortable setting off against the Persians. When he was finally able to move back into southern Greece, he found that he still had to deal with the city of Thebes.

A full year had passed since Phillip's death, and Thebes was the last place to resist accept Alexander as their leader. Although he tried several times to send embassadors requesting that the city surrender on peaceful terms, they stubbornly refused. As a result, he had no choice and had to advance on the city, leaving it totally destroyed.

To say that he intentionally destroyed Thebes to set an example would probably be obverstating things. By the time he came to Thebes, the rest of Greece had pretty much accepted his leadership. It may be true that he destroyed the city to set an example of what would happen to others who may choose to defy him, but he didn't appear to have set out with that intention.

See Alexander's Balkan Campaign to read some more information.

share|improve this answer
Worth noting that Thebes was a bit special: It was considered at the time the most ancient Greek city, and up until Phillip obliterated the Sacred Band, it had considerable military power. Furthermore Thebes was traditionally antagonistic, siding with the Persians during the Greco Persian wars, with the Spartans during the Peloponnesian War (Thebes is far more closer to Athens than Sparta) and also derailed Agesilaus Asian campaign (battles of Leuctra & Mantinea). – Yannis Rizos Nov 28 '12 at 13:48
Lastly, Philip was brought up in Thebes, as a hostage, and although he spared the city, it's not inconceivable that the young Alexander would want to make a statement against the city that had captured his father. Plutarch mentions that Alexander was favourable to Thebans after the destruction of the city, possibly having regretted his decision and trying to make amends. /cc: @Alenanno. – Yannis Rizos Nov 28 '12 at 13:50
@YannisRizos Thanks for the additional information! :) – Alenanno Nov 28 '12 at 14:02
1  
Thanks for the answer Steven! :) – Alenanno Feb 28 at 23:00

Yes, the city in question was Thebes.

UPDT: For a source, check out the always-excellent livius.org website. Here.

share|improve this answer
Hello Felix, thanks for the answer. Would you mind to elaborate a bit? I mean, adding references, explanations, etc. Thanks. :) – Alenanno Nov 27 '12 at 11:03
5  
Good answer - but as @alenanno says, a reference would help for those of us who would like to read "the rest of the story". – Mark C. Wallace Nov 27 '12 at 12:45
I would agree with @MarkC.Wallace, as there are no sources, and elaboration would be both helpful and interesting in this instance, I believe. Is there anything more you could post, Felix? – Reliable Source Nov 27 '12 at 13:23
2  
@ReliableSource I find your nickname to be quite ironic in this situation. :D eheh nice. – Alenanno Nov 27 '12 at 16:27

The city was Thebes. When Alexander was busy crushing revolts across the Danube, he received word that the Thebans were also revolting and that Athens was involved from the shadows.

In addition to this, news of Alexander had not reached the southern Greek city states in some time. He had been busy with the siege of Pelium and news had reached them that he had died during the course of this siege. Demosthenes - a prominent Athenian politician - produced a man who claimed to have been present at the siege and claimed that Alexander was dead. Alexander had indeed, been injured during the course of this siege, so it was not a totally implausible claim to make.

Upon learning of the alleged death of Alexander, Theban exiles in Athens raced off to their native city in Boeotia and sought to incite a revolt from Macedonian rule there. The Cadmaea, the citadel that was situated upon a hill in Thebes, was occupied by a Macedonian garrison, and it was this place that the Thebans sought to attack. To this effect, they killed two Macedonian officers who had been roaming the city, and declared their independence from Macedonia.

In The Campaigns of Alexander, Arrian states that Alexander was suspicious of the Athenians and believed that not taking the Thebans seriously might undermine his rule as "the spirit of disaffecion might spread" to a number of other states. That said, he did not immediately attack Thebes and instead chose to wait nearby to give the Thebans time to think things over and treat with him. They were however in no such mood and attacked Alexander instead with some effect. He consequently marched onto the Cadmeia, the citadel of Thebes.

The subsequent battle was bloody eventually leading to the army entering the citadel for an "urban battle" with the Thebans. The latter eventually gave up and fled.

In what followed it was not so much the Macedonians as the Phocians, Plataeans, and men from other Boeotian towns who, in the lust of battle, indiscriminately slaughtered the Thebans, who no longer put up any organized resistance. They burst into houses and killed the occupants; others they cut down as they attempted to show fight; others, again, even as they clung to temple altars, sparing neither women nor children. (Arrian, page 59)

The allied troops who took part in the fighting were entrusted by Alexander with the final settlement of the fate of Thebes. They decided to garrison the Cadmeia, but to raze the city itself to the ground. All its territory but the places hallowed by religious associations was to be divided among the allies; the women, the children and all the men who survived were to be sold into slavery ... (Arrian, page 62)

The result of the brutal Theban debacle was that the other fractious states such as the Arcadians, Eleans, Aetolians, and Athens itself decided to behave and immediately patched matters up with Alexander.

Therefore, going by Arrian's account, Alexander was hoping to quell the Theban revolt through a little muscle-flexing and diplomacy. The Thebans were not amenable (and were actually convinced that he was a fake) and decided to play rough. The fog of war and Alexander's bloodthirsty allies did the rest and he presumably let matters run their course to serve as a warning and a lesson to other states considering going the Theban route. At any rate, he did not arbitrarily raze Thebes in order to prove something.

(There is some suggestion that Darius was funding these uprisings.

The expedition against Persia had been long in the works, and Alexander did make it a secret that he planned to avenge the atrocities committed in Greece by Persia a century and a half before. Despite that at the time his kingdom had been a Persian vassal state. It was as a result of this planned expedition that the Great King Darius III started to distribute money to the Greek city states with the hope that they would rise against their new Hegemon.

After razing Thebes, Alexander began his Persian expedition.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.