Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

After the defeat of the French fleet off the coast of Egypt in 1798, Napoleon's army was cut off in a far away and hostile country.

One year later, after eluding the British fleet, he made it safely to France.

Some argue that he bought some British commanders, while others discount this hypothesis and acknowledge a mix of luck and courage on Napoleon's behalf.

In order to judge the likelihood of different scenarios, it seems to me that we must know what level of surveillance he had to elude in his sail.

So, what countermeasures did the British - and their allies - employ to prevent Napoleon from leaving the Middle East?

share|improve this question
    
The wikipedia link you gave has a <citation needed> tag hovering over the hypothesis that Napoleon bought off the British commanders. To me, it sounds highly unlikely - they were hell bent on fighting him every inch of the way, particularly Sydney Smith. –  Felix Goldberg Jan 23 '13 at 13:49
add comment

1 Answer

Bonaparte's biographer Vincent Cronin's mentions the British naval blockade but no further preventive countermeasures (that I could find upon brief reconsultation). Perhaps this is because this is a one-volume biography of a (in some ways :) big subject.

As to Sidney Smith's role (he is also mentioned in the Wikipedia article), his biographer Tom Pocock cites several letters from Smith to Bonaparte in A Thirst For Glory: The Life of Admiral Sir Sidney Smith, which seem to follow normal military practice of the time. One of them, written closely before ending the Siege of Acre, may have caused the (possible) misunderstanding about Sidney furthering French royalist interests by letting Bonaparte escape from Egypt. Pocock introduces it thus:

Turkish ships from Rhodes had brought with them several staff officers, including his [Smith]'s French royalist friend Major de Frotté; they had told [Smith] of the French consul named Beauchamp, whom Napolean had sent on a mission to Constantinople to negotiate with the Sultan, even offering the possibility of an eventual French withdrawal from Egypt. Beauchamp had been detained and details of his mission forwarded to Smith, who now wrote to Bonaparte in French, enclosing the Turkish leaflet offering safe passage home to French soldiers who surrendered.

Here is an excerpt from Smith's letter to Bonaparte:

I believe I may send you the enclosed proclamation of the Ottoman Porte without your finding it out of place ... I do ask you this, 'Are you willing to evacuate your troops from the territory of the Ottoman Empire before the intervention of the great allied armies changes the nature of the question?' You may believe me, Monsieur Le Général, that my only motive in asking you this is my desire to avoid further bloodshed.

At this point Pocock references p. 300 in Christopher J Herold's Bonaparte in Egypt, which I do not have available for consultation right now. He also says that the letter stung Bonaparte. There is no indication that e.g. de Frotté may have influenced Smith towards sending the letter (and the leaflet).

Pocock specifically mentions that Smith made use of the Naval blockade to prevent Bonaparte from returning to France (this is after the end of the siege):

Out at sea, Smith could make an accurate assumption of Bonaparte's reaction [to the news that in Europe, the Directoary had ordered Bonaparte back to France and that French armies were being expelled from Germany and Italy] and he wrote the Admiralty to warn them he expected Bonaparte would try to return to France; therefore every effort should be made to intercept him at sea.

Again, there is no further indication of a conspiracy or active support by Sidney for facilitating the escape of Bonaparte's (notice that the Wikipedia article says "citation needed" when suggesting so.) Just this:

The voyage [which started on August 23, 1799] was tense and slow, a British sail always expected, and occasionally seen, on the horizons.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1; that should settle the question. I think somebody also should edit this theory out of wikipedia. –  Felix Goldberg Jan 23 '13 at 15:02
    
+1 But I was looking also for data concerning the British (and Ottoman, if they contributed) blockade. E.g. number of vessels, places of surveillance etc. –  astabada Jan 23 '13 at 15:29
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.