Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm in a Year 11 Ancient history class studying Rome, and whenever I look over ancient sources on wikipedia, there is always a list of lost works, and occasionally a sentence describing how unfortunate it is we don't have one of them, for whatever particular reason.

I'm curious though, are these actually works that are lost permanently, or are we still discovering more of these currently?

Take Suetonius as an example of such a historian.

share|improve this question
    
Indeed, much of the history of the Roman Kingdom (8th to 6th centuries B.C.) and early Republic were lost, largely thanks to the Gauls' sacking of Rome in the 4th century B.C. A great shame indeed, but it's how history goes. –  Noldorin Nov 11 '11 at 19:16
    
Lost works are lost. We can't predict that they'll ever be discovered and in most cases the chance that they'll ever be discovered is negligible. –  Mark C. Wallace Sep 16 '13 at 14:29
    
Mysteries of the past are important to work upon, but I'm not sure this question can be answered in any valuable way. –  New Alexandria Sep 17 '13 at 14:51
add comment

5 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

There are some minor works that have been discovered over the past twenty years or so, but nothing of any major importance that I can recall. As to whether or not these other major works have been lost forever, the answer is that they most likely have indeed been lost. The great fire of Rome that Suetonius mentions was responsible for destroying a considerable number of scrolls, but nobody can say exactly how many or even what they might have contained. Furthermore, the destruction of the Library of Alexandria resulted in the loss of countless more. It is estmated that this library alone contained half a million documents.

In addition to this, the ancient sources of information were not always stored in secure locations,and the manner in which they were recorded was not reliable. Most of the scrolls from that period would have naturally deteriorated over time. Those that have been found over the past century have mostly been documents that were stored in some fashion that protected them from the ravages of time.

share|improve this answer
add comment

There are so many lost works that it is probably impossible to establish a comprehensive catalogue. Not to mention of course those works we will never know they even existed.

Even in recent times the burning of libraries can wipe out invaluable manuscripts (e.g. Jaffna library).

Two examples which immediately come to mind:

  1. The history of the Etruscans composed by emperor Claudius (his first giant wife being of Etruscan origin).

  2. The Apocryphal Gospels. Think for instance that the mother of the discoverers of the Nag Hammadi library did actually burn the vast majority of the works that had survived for centuries... just to cook the household food...

And there are many more. We would love to have the detailed account of Pytheas' exploration of Ancient Britain for example.

Wikipedia has a catalogue mainly applicable to western culture which will give you an overview ordered by famous authors.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not to quibble, but this isn't really an 'or' question. Yes, we'll keep discovering things we haven't found, and yes, there are many things that have been permanently lost.

Keep in mind that before the printing press you didn't go to the bookstore - you found a guy who had the book you wanted, and asked if you could crash at his house for a couple of weeks while you copied it out by hand. A book has to be pretty good for people to do that for a thousand years.

Many potentially interesting historical records, like letters and personal diaries, would never have been copied at all, and were lost when the original was burnt, left out in the rain, or whatever. Factor in deliberate destruction, and it's really kind of amazing that we have as much as we do.

share|improve this answer
    
>"if you could crash at his house for a couple of weeks while you copied it out by hand". Very true!! The fact is that large works have seldom come down to us complete. Take Polybius for instance: only the first five of the original 40 books in his "Histories" are complete, the rest is only known through fragments. And they nearly didn't make it: they are all known to come from one single source (same spelling mistakes) - a manuscript from Constantinople Imperial Library. The same holds true for Livy: his "History of Rome" counted 142 books of which we don't have even half. –  Alain Pannetier Jan 31 '12 at 20:12
    
By discovering more of these currently, I didn't mean discover all of them, obviously there's things that are permenently lost. My question was more into whether or not we still discover ancient sources, or if what we have now is by and large what we'll always have. –  Tomas Cokis Feb 2 '12 at 16:54
    
@AlainPannetier It's worth bearing in mind that anceint "books" were smaller than modern ones (presumably they were actually measured in scrolls). For example, the first ten books of Livius (which have survived, fortunately) fit nicely, with endnotes and an introduciton, into a modern volume of reasonable heft. So what they called "in X books" is to be understood more like "in X parts". Of course it's still a great pity they are lost! –  Felix Goldberg Jul 4 '13 at 9:40
add comment

The dead sea scrolls are an example of something major being found by chance. It is possible there are other stores like those but it is unlikely. The further we go, the less chance of finding something usable exists.

A better link would be the dead sea scrolls online.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The Aswan Dam systems destroyed or covered with water many historical artifacts of Ancient Egypt. Some are apparently lost forever, some have been rescued, some are being rediscovered now, or can be observed using special tools and gear, (scuba diving, etc) or at particular times of the year or day, depending on the rising and falling of the Nile.

A quick internet search will reveal numerous references and sources. Here's one: Egypt: Historical Pharaonic Egyptian Sites - Pharaonic Temples

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.