Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking to find how certain diseases or impairments were viewed during the Roman Empire (circa ~50AD) by the Roman culture prior, during, and after that time.

I'm mainly looking for physical disorders starting with blindness, and then psychological disorders starting with Tourette's syndrome (verbal tics) and ranging to full breakdowns.

I've found some articles on living conditions, treatment, etc. etc. But what I really want to know is how these impairments were viewed by the culture.


Here's a start on mental illness!

share|improve this question
    
Welcome to History - Stack Exchange. I could only provide a source for law competency of blind people in Theodosius times, but I believe it's 300 years too late. Good luck with research! –  Darek Wędrychowski Mar 21 '13 at 7:17
    
Great question & welcome to the site. +1 of course –  Felix Goldberg Mar 21 '13 at 7:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I've focused on blind people status in 1st century, I hope it will help a bit.

According to Catherine Slater's article at Langdon Down Museum of Learning Disability, in the mentioned period (1st century):

Early Roman law gave power to the father to have absolute rights over his children. He could expose any female infant or a child of either sex who was deformed or disabled.

The details are provided in the work "Gynaecology" by Soranus of Ephesus, especially in the chapter entitled "How to recognise the Newborn that is worth rearing". Quoting the linked website further here's what Soranus wrote:

The child should be perfect in all its parts, limbs and senses and have passages that are not obstructed including the ears, nose, throat, urethra and anus.

This way I believe that at least children that were born blind could be killed or abandoned (whatever is closer to the definition of "exposure") by parents in full accordance with the law.

And the presence of such law gives a valuable hint that the status of such people in culture would be very low.

share|improve this answer
    
For a detailed discussion of what exactly exposure entailed, see history.stackexchange.com/questions/7308/… –  Felix Goldberg Mar 21 '13 at 7:36
    
Thanks, I didn't realize of existence of such topic here. –  Darek Wędrychowski Mar 21 '13 at 7:39
    
By your logic the prevalence of abortions in modern culture means that the status of every human is low. –  Anixx Mar 21 '13 at 14:10
    
That was enough for what I was researching! Thanks! –  Nathan Goings Mar 26 '13 at 2:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.