Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've found that speaking of the first woman ruler in history, most common materials (like Wikipedia or Britannica) point at the Egyptian pharaon Hatshepsut, living in the 16th century BCE. As a source at Wiki there's provided an American archeologist James Henry Breasted, who established the study of Egyptology in the United States.

But he died around 80 years ago. So is that still accurate to our knowledge of ancient history? Who was the first woman ruler in history, according to current scientific researches?

share|improve this question
    
he died or she died? –  Anixx Apr 8 '13 at 1:14
    
He (James) died around 80 years ago. She (Hatshepsut) died around 3600 years ago. I refer to the fact that his researches were done around a century ago. And during the 20th century there was such a civilization jump, that we can now have completely different view on the subject. –  Darek Wędrychowski Apr 8 '13 at 1:41
2  
I don't think it can be answered since matriarchial societies are as old as human race. And we can say these women were rulers of their tribe. –  CsBalazsHungary Apr 8 '13 at 9:39
    
@CsBalazsHungary If we approach this as a written history question, it can be (and has been) answered (although better answers might still appear). And frankly, we should be approaching all our questions as written history ones, if a question is about prehistoric times, that should be clear in the question's text. –  Yannis Rizos Apr 10 '13 at 13:47

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

The first (known) female Pharaoh is Sobekneferu (or Neferusobek) that ruled Egypt three centuries before Hatshepsut, from 1806 to 1802 BC. Sobekneferu is probably the earlier female ruler (in general, not only Egypt's) whose name we know and for whose reign we can be reasonably certain.

James Henry Breasted regarded Hatshepsut as "the first great woman in history of whom we are informed.", and I think you read that with emphasis on "first" when you should have read it with emphasis on "great" and "informed". Hatshepsut had a very long and (mostly) peacefull reign, and is commonly quoted as one of the most succesfull Pharaohs.

Another candidate for the earlier female ruler is Nitocris, a female Pharaoh mentioned by Herodotus:

[Hdt. 2.100.1] After him came three hundred and thirty kings, whose names the priests recited from a papyrus roll. In all these many generations there were eighteen Ethiopian kings, and one queen, native to the country; the rest were all Egyptian men.
[Hdt. 2.100.2] The name of the queen was the same as that of the Babylonian princess, Nitocris. She, to avenge her brother (he was king of Egypt and was slain by his subjects, who then gave Nitocris the sovereignty) put many of the Egyptians to death by treachery.
[Hdt. 2.100.3] She built a spacious underground chamber; then, with the pretence of inaugurating it, but with quite another intent in her mind, she gave a great feast, inviting to it those Egyptians whom she knew to have had the most complicity in her brother's murder; and while they feasted, she let the river in upon them by a vast secret channel
[Hdt. 2.100.4] This was all that the priests told of her, except that when she had done this she cast herself into a chamber full of hot ashes, to escape vengeance.

Nitocris is traditionally placed at the end of the Sixth Dynasty, with her rule being from 2184 – 2181 BC, however her historicity is strongly disputed as she isn't mentioned anywhere else.

Lastly, a much earlier candidate is Merneith (Meritnit, Meryet-Nit or Meryt-Neith), a 30th century BC (possible) ruler of Egypt, for who very little is known.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks a lot! +1 and possible accept. It turns out I should remember Nitocris, as she's mentioned in one of two most famous Polish novels about ancient times (Pharaoh by Bolesław Prus, the second one being the Nobel winner Quo Vadis by Henryk Sienkiewicz). –  Darek Wędrychowski Apr 7 '13 at 19:29
1  
@DarekWędrychowski You're welcome. And while I appreciate that you consider accepting my answer, there's no rush. On my own questions I typically wait at least two weeks (and sometimes more) before accepting an answer (assuming of course a satisfying answer exists). I've found that the green checkmark severely limits the visibility of the question, and that's not something we really want, at least not until we are reasonably certain that a better answer won't appear. –  Yannis Rizos Apr 7 '13 at 19:36

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.