History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On 15 August, six days after the bombing of Nagasaki, Japan announced its surrender to the United States, signing the instrument of surrender on 2 September, officially ending the war.

The question is: Why didn't the United States drop another atomic bomb between 9 August and 15 August, at the risk of not having the war ended in a short time? How certain are we that the United States didn't have a third atomic bomb to drop over Japan?

share|improve this question
After reading the complexity of the answers, this is a better question than I thought. – T.E.D. May 17 '13 at 12:35
@T.E.D. now I wonder what the other complex answers were, given that only Drux's one remains. – o0'. Jun 15 '15 at 21:06
@Lohoris - There's a negatively voted answer here, and a halfway decent one deleted by owner, both that had some good info in them, but weren't properly sourced (among other issues). – T.E.D. Jun 15 '15 at 21:48

Ray Monk in Inside the Center: The Life of J. Robert Oppenheimer tells the story thus:

Truman returned to Washington from Potsdam on the evening of 7 August and was immediately caught up in a whirlwind of activity generated by Groves, who was determined to proceed as quickly as possible with a second bombing of Japan. He and Admiral William Purnell, Groves writes in his autobiography, 'had often discussed the importance of having the second bomb follow the first one quickly', so that the Japanese would not have time to recover their balance'. This second bomb would have to be of the Fat Man type, there being no chance of assembling another uranium bomb at this stage (in fact, the Little Boy remained one of its kind; the Fat Man design, despite its complicated assembly, being easier to manufacture, safer to transport and more powerful). After the success of the Trinity test, the only thing standing in the way of using a Fat Man bomb in Japan was the availability of plutonium. Groves had originally been advised that a plutonium bomb could be ready to use on August 20. At the end of July, this was revised to 11 August. Groves, however, was too impatient to wait that long and, somewhat against the advice he was given by the scientists, saw to it that the bomb was assembled, loaded and ready to use by the evening of 8 August [...]

Immediately after the Nagasaki bombing the Allies did not possess any more atomic bombs. It is true, as Groves puts it, 'our entire organization both at Los Alamos and at Tinian was maintained in a state of complete readiness to prepare additional bombs', but, as he himself reported to General Marshall, the earliest data at which the next bomb could be assembled for use was 17 August, and almost everybody expected the war to be over by then.

BTW, there are also interesting original documents available from the Truman Library. And if you want my personal opinion: two such bombs were more than enough.

share|improve this answer
they had no bombs ready to drop, but they did have all the materials required to build them ready to go. Remember that each bomb was an experimental one-off device, there was no series production (yet). So while technically they had no bombs, they were capable of building more (up to a limit of another 2-3 at least) in short order (the time needed to ship them to Guam by ship for mating to the bombers would be longer than the time needed to construct the devices, time that would have been used to train the crews for their deployment). – jwenting Jun 16 '15 at 8:30

protected by two sheds Jun 15 '15 at 17:34

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?