History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why didn't the states of the Arabian peninsula industrialize around the time that Europe and East Asia were? Was it simply a lack of accessible natural resources? Why not import coal?

share|improve this question
riba, interest on credit, is forbidden & illegal. it's impossible to "industrialize" without it – user2296 May 16 '13 at 23:57
@JoeCoderGuy Can you provide sources to back your claim and perhaps turn it into an answer? – lins314159 May 17 '13 at 7:14
@JoeCoderGuy I would be very likely to upvote an answer based on your comment. – Mark C. Wallace May 17 '13 at 17:47
Someone somewhere on this site once remarked that one not ask why did country X not industrialise but rather why did Europe industrialise. Cannot find a link to that comment though. – Apoorv Khurasia May 18 '13 at 11:11

Europe and East Asia didn't industrialize at the same time. In all of East Asia, probably the first country to Industrialize was Japan, and that didn't happen until the right around the beginning of the 20th century, nearly a century after the process started in Western Europe.

So really you have to compare with Europe. The big advantage here was simply one of demographics; both sheer numbers and growth.

In 1815 all the Arab states together had about 13 million people. There were perhaps about 6 million more Arabs living in the Ottoman empire (The empire had a respectable 25 million, but most of those were Turks or Balkan Europeans). This is barely more people than were living in the same area 500 years earlier. Supplying goods to that cultural area in the same way they were supplied in the 1300's was probably not much of a strain.

In that same period of time, Europe's population (not counting Russia, which is kind of a special case) exploded from about 67 million (roughly 5 times the Arab states) to nearly 200 million. Keeping 200 million human beings clothed, heated, and fed every year simply required new more efficient methods of weaving, heating, and farming.

(Population numbers taken from The New Penguin Atlas of Medieval History and The Penguin Atlas of Recent History, both by Colin McEvedy.)

share|improve this answer
Thanks, I think this is a convincing answer, necessity being the mother of invention. – ATaylor May 17 '13 at 11:47
The pop growth was a result of industrialization (and other advancements), not the opposite. – Anixx May 17 '13 at 14:25
I would argue that Japan begun their industrialization in the 1860's after the Meiji Restoration, and by the 20th century had modern cities with lightning, tram ways, etc. They even built their own steel warships. – Evil Washing Machine Feb 4 '14 at 0:24

Saudi Arabia encompasses large deserts, and industrial goods have a low "value to weight" ratio. The goods that are likely to be shipped across such deserts have a high value relative to their weight, such as cinnamin, silk, and precious metals.

At the time of the Industrial Revolution (in Europe), most people of Saudi Arabia were still nomadic. People who are nomads are not likely to build factories to "industrialize."

Also, at the time of the industrial revolution, the Hejaz, or the most advanced parts of Saudi Arabia along the Red Sea, was directly under Ottoman rule, rather than being part of the "vassal" state known as Saudi Arabia.


Only in modern times has Saudi Arabia had a commodity, oil, that makes it worth industrializing.

share|improve this answer
But the Arabian peninsula is just a small part of the Arab world. What about the rest of it? – Felix Goldberg May 19 '13 at 14:08
@Felix Goldberg: Here, it says that "the original homeland of the Arabs is the Arabian Peninsula." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_world The rest of the "Arab World" is actually a hodgepodge of peoples including the Arabs. And the OP specifically said, "Arabian peninsula" in the first line. – Tom Au May 19 '13 at 17:36
Yes, but we are assuming he is asking about the 16th-17th-18th century here. Otherwise, why not ask why didn't the Byzantines industrialize? – Felix Goldberg May 19 '13 at 17:40
@Felix Goldberg: The OP tagged it with 20th and 19th centuries. That's about as clear as you can get. – Tom Au May 19 '13 at 17:42
Good point... otoh, the OP also assumed Europe and E.Asia industrialized at the same time. And he has "Arab states" in the title. Actually, the question is a bit too confusing. – Felix Goldberg May 19 '13 at 18:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.