Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How does a historian or an amateur determine what legitimate methods can be used and what legitimate sources are? Obviously there are many methods to read texts and speculate about political, social, cultural and individual past experiences; but how are legitimate and illegitimate methods marked? Some sources are obviously very good and very useful, others very bad but very useful, yet others are very good or very bad but not at all useful. How is this differentiation made in historiography?

share|improve this question
    
This should be migrated on meta. –  user2237 May 29 '13 at 17:34
4  
@Carlo_R. I disagree. I think meta should be for discussions about the site itself. –  Monster Truck Jun 1 '13 at 1:34
    
I think you should read The Craft of Research by Booth et. al. They really detail what historical sources are considered legitimate and what sources are citable etc. –  franklin Jul 27 '13 at 2:37
    
I found John Lewis Gaddis' The Landscape of History to be surprisingly readable for a layman, on this topic. –  Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jan 22 at 5:11
add comment

1 Answer 1

When assessing sources, one of the warning signs to watch for is a tight loop of self-references amongst a small group of authors, often even a single author, with no citations into the group from outside it. External citations from within the group will be made to mimic the sheen of respectability. This often signals an extreme viewpoint well outside the mainstream, because it is very rare for a single researcher or small group to be well advanced of the mainstream.

Of course, not all such small tight groups are kooks. Continental Drift was ridiculed for two generations before becoming a consensus and accumulating hard geologic evidence. The terms Black Hole and Big Bang were first coined as terms of ridicule because the constructs seemed so unlikely, but are now mainstream physics. However one must be particularly wary in using such sources.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.