History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This memorial plaque lists the numbers of Georgians who served in various wars and details the casualties. What I find odd is that for WWI, Korea, Vietnam, and Gulf round numbers are given for the participants, whereas for WWII a strangely exact number is given - 324373. The lists of casualties do not appear to be rounded throughout.

Is there an explanation for this oddness?

share|improve this question
4  
my guess is they'd use conscription numbers for WW2, while for the other wars there was a large section of professional troops where it's hard to tell whether they're from your state or not. Do you count birth, last home as a civilian, or last US based posting before being sent overseas? – jwenting Jun 17 '13 at 9:18
    
@jwenting: This sounds like a (good) answer. Why don't you post it as one? – Felix Goldberg Jun 17 '13 at 9:46
4  
1) I've no evidence, it's based on my knowledge of the makeup of the US armed forces in those conflicts. 2) it'd just get downvoted by the usual suspects anyway. – jwenting Jun 17 '13 at 13:09
    
Maybe I'm OCD, but I found odd the "0 MIA" in the 5th bullet point: they could have just omitted that, it's not a table! Technically they are saluting, among the others, that group of 0 soldiers, too. – o0'. Dec 22 '13 at 18:49
    
@Lohoris this way preserves the symmetry of the table, of there were nothing there people'd complain about that, or think the number had faded somehow. – jwenting Dec 23 '13 at 6:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.