Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I learned cursive in Romania, and I encountered some discrepancies between how I learned and the American way of writing. The first row of letters in the picture is the way I learned, and in the second row I wrote them in print in case they are unfamiliar. The American way can be found doing a quick google search. enter image description here

Which way is more historically accurate? Is there a difference in writing between Europe and America? I know I could just look at some old documents, but most that you find online are American, and I was hoping someone could also give me a more in-depth reason for these differences. Thanks.

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by Lennart Regebro, Mark C. Wallace, Kobunite, Steven Drennon Aug 14 '13 at 22:29

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
The lower row does not look like cursive at all. Are you sure you have printed the characters accurately? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… is how cursive looks. –  Monster Truck Jun 29 '13 at 1:54
2  
What do you mean by more historically accurate? If you can't answer that, I don't think your question is answerable. –  Joe Jun 29 '13 at 4:04
    
@MonsterTruck I said that the upper row is the cursive I learned, and the lower row is just the print version of those letters in case you don't recognize what they are, since maybe you learned cursive the way I see it here (in America) –  Ovi Jun 29 '13 at 5:33
    
@Joe Sorry I just realized how ambiguous that is. What I mean by more historical accurate is which version is found in most historical documents, the way I have shown in the picture (the top row only) or the way they teach in America (which can be found by a quick google search of "cursive"). –  Ovi Jun 29 '13 at 5:36
4  
@Ovi, have you considered that both ways of writing may be common? I've seen both of those types of writing in the US, even both used by the same person, in different contexts. –  Joe Jun 29 '13 at 21:53
show 5 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The Romanian way is historically slightly older: it is like a style thst was common in the United States around the 1700s-1800s. The current USA style is an elaborated 1900s descendant of that earlier style ... But even that earlier style, itself, descends from an even simpler style that was used in the earliest published textbooks about handwriting, during the Renaissance era. That earlier style (typical of Europe's oldest published books on handwriting) is called "italic handwriting," so you may wish to search that term on Google or Bing.

share|improve this answer
    
Hello and welcome to History.SE! Per the help center, I've removed your signature. Because your posts are always pre-signed with your usercard, there's no need to re-sign them. :) Again, welcome to History.SE and thanks for your answer. –  American Luke Jul 5 '13 at 3:19
    
Thank you very much –  Ovi Jul 5 '13 at 16:44
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.