Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I watched The Life of Brian and I heard this quotation:

And from our fathers' fathers' fathers.

Reg: Yes.

Stan: And from our fathers' fathers' fathers' fathers.

Reg: All right, Stan. Don't labour the point. And what have they ever given us in return?

Xerxes: The aqueduct.

Reg: Oh yeah, yeah they gave us that. Yeah. That's true.

Masked Activist: And the sanitation!

Stan: Oh yes... sanitation, Reg, you remember what the city used to be like.

Reg: All right, I'll grant you that the aqueduct and the sanitation are two things that the Romans have done...

Matthias: And the roads...

Reg: (sharply) Well yes obviously the roads... the roads go without saying. But apart from the aqueduct, the sanitation and the roads...

Another Masked Activist: Irrigation...

Other Masked Voices: Medicine... Education... Health...

Reg: Yes... all right, fair enough...

Activist Near Front: And the wine...

Omnes: Oh yes! True!

Francis: Yeah. That's something we'd really miss if the Romans left, Reg.

Masked Activist at Back: Public baths!

Stan: And it's safe to walk in the streets at night now.

Francis: Yes, they certainly know how to keep order... (general nodding)... let's face it, they're the only ones who could in a place like this.

(more general murmurs of agreement)

Reg: All right... all right... but apart from better sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public order... what have the Romans done for us?

Xerxes: Brought peace!

Reg: (very angry, he's not having a good meeting at all) What!? Oh... (scornfully) Peace, yes... shut up!

Historically, what did the Romans do for Judea? Did they build aqueducts, roads, sanitation, etc.?

share|improve this question
5  
Romans did not care one little bit what religion the people they converted where. They treated all of them the same: as long as you paid taxes, did not rebel, worshipped the Roman gods (which really you are already doing under a different name) and allowed trade, you would be part of the Empire and as such ripe all its benefits. Jews, have a monotheistic religion were a little hard to sell on the "worship our gods" hence a lot of a tension -- but that is another question. –  Sardathrion Dec 12 '11 at 8:07
6  
+1 for Monty Python. –  DVK Dec 12 '11 at 8:09
5  
@Sardathrion - I think the meat of Jim's question is, now much of those benefits of being part of the Empire were something brought to Judea by Romans and benefitting the populace - so there are 3 factors: the benefit was missing before Romans, the benefit was done by Romans, and the benefit actually benefitted the native populace (as opposed to merely the Roman army or Roman-installed king). –  DVK Dec 12 '11 at 8:12
4  
The place was already pretty Helenestic after Alexander- so probably not much of a change. It may have led to a bit more stability not worrying if the Seleucids or Egyptians were going to invade next. So allows for some good infighting between different groups of priests –  none Dec 12 '11 at 16:03
1  
@Jim Thio, for future reference there is a formatting guide next to the question field. –  Travis Christian Dec 12 '11 at 16:09

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Stability.

Survival is not just a theme in Judaism, but a well-learned lesson. If you are not the threatening party, then you are the threatened party, and more often than not Judaism faced complete annihilation or enslavement at the hands of a larger and unfriendly force.

Aside from the ancillary wonders of societal, cultural, and technological advancements (for which they paid as much or more as any other governed people by taxation), as long as the Romans ruled the Jews, the Jews would survive. Their fate was less predictable under other large powers of the time, and the stability of those empires themselves were often called into question.

This would understate why the Jewish authority at the time took such a dim view of Jesus and others like him- Rome wanted no problems, and people like Jesus were nothing but a problem, running around and empowering people under a different 'master' than a Roman one. With Jesus having no actual power or influence amongst the Jewish authorities, it was a logical decision for them (and less predicated on egotistical ideologies) when Rome came a-knockin' - offer up Jesus, or the whole will take a real beating all around. It was a stability move.

share|improve this answer
2  
No other answers. Yea Jesus is a trouble maker, being liberal and all. It's natural that he got screwed. It's funny how religious leaders bitch about that so much and then do the exact same thing toward people with new strange idea. It's also funny how ancient jews kill their own prophets (and hence trouble maker too), and Jesus told them that they're the same guy. It's like history repeating itself again and again. If we don't see this in terms of right and wrong, things look very natural. –  Jim Thio Apr 23 '12 at 7:04
    
This is a very interesting, unique perspective. –  dotancohen Jul 8 at 14:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.