Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Modern media seems to portray Joan of Arc as a very attractive girl. I don't quite buy this interpretation of her as it would also suggest plenty of suitors and could be counter productive in a camp full of men frustrated at the state of their country. So was Joan of Arc really as attractive as modern media suggests, or was she just a plain peasant girl who managed to uplift a country?

share|improve this question
    
Alas, I don't have a citation, but the last biography I listened to (audiobook) specifically mentioned one of her contemporaries commenting that he had seen her changing clothes and that although she was well formed as a woman, that he felt no unseemly impulse. I really wish I could find a source. –  Mark C. Wallace Aug 2 '13 at 15:02
    
"could be counter productive in a camp full of men frustrated at the state of their country." Dubious - see edit. –  Vector Aug 5 '13 at 9:00
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

There is a contemporary portrait of Joan of Arc in the art section of this site. However, none of it can be verified as being accurate and the artist had never seen Joanne. There are some short descriptions of her during her trial (here and here) and a biography here that do go into some detail of what she might have looked like. Of course, you can get the trial transcript yourself.

Solving a Mystery: What Did Joan of Arc Look Like? by Patricia Nell Warren offers an hypothesis as to what she might have looked like. Another, more silly is a view of different representation of her...

share|improve this answer
3  
Before any readers get exited, the exposition around that "contempoary portrait" mentions that the artist had never actually laid eyes on her. –  T.E.D. Aug 2 '13 at 18:16
    
@Sardathrion : "Another, more silly is a view of different representation of her..." Indeed - amazing what people's imagination can produce. I'll stick with the SE and wikipedia images... They are not first hand evidence, but it's clear that there was no apparent attempt to stylize or embellish the images. I surmise they are fairly accurate. –  Vector Aug 6 '13 at 3:51
add comment

enter image description here

Painting, c. 1485. An artist's interpretation, since the only known direct portrait has not survived. (Centre Historique des Archives Nationales, Paris, AE II 2490)

i.e. - We don't know that she really looked like.

Also:

could be counter productive in a camp full of men frustrated at the state of their country.

I don't think that History supports your theory, particularly in the case of France: During the French Revolution there were similar situations - attractive women involved in battle. In fact, in History, Carlyle in 1.7.V describes one of the most prominent a figures in the Revolution, one Demoiselle Theroigne, who was compared by some to Joan of Arc also know as "the Maid of Orleans". (Perhaps we can deduce from the comparison to Joan of Arc that Joan was also reasonably attractive, although this is admittedly a stretch.)

The seized cannon are yoked with seized cart-horses: brown- locked Demoiselle Theroigne, with pike and helmet, sits there as gunneress, ‘with haughty eye and serene fair countenance;’ comparable, some think, to the Maid of Orleans, or even recalling ‘the idea of Pallas Athene.’

Anne-Josèphe Théroigne de Méricourt

Anne-Josèphe Théroigne de Méricourt

She was the most prominent of the women involved in the French Revolution, but there also were many others, and Carlyle is not shy about describing some of them as quite fetching indeed. Yet they were not a distraction, but an asset: they inspired and encouraged the men, they sometimes fought themselves, and most interestingly, according to Carlyle's account (disputed by others) Demoiselle Theroigne actually led a group of women during the Women's Insurrection and March to Versailles whose mission it was go and mingle with certain groups of soldiers loyal to Louis XVI, and seduce them into submission.... Much more has been written about the role of women in the French revolution as well (sources forthcoming...)

Bottom line: It seems that if you're busy fighting a war trying to fix your country, you probably have other things on your mind. You accept even very attractive women as soldiers and leaders and stick to business. Time for fun after the war.

share|improve this answer
add comment

We don't know what she looked like, but we are informed by people close to her that she was an attractive, well proportioned girl

Since I can't copy/paste from the source, and some people are having trouble reaching it, page 24 contains the sentence,

"The person closet to her from April 1429 to May 1430 claimed he was surprised to never have been tempted to approach her, 'although she was an attractive, well proportioned girl'. The footnote from that sentence is to a quotation in french quoting DuParc

The book in question is "Joan of Arc: Reality and Myth By D. E. H. de Boer, Marina Warner"

share|improve this answer
    
I can't see the page with the footnote, I'm afraid. –  Evil Washing Machine Aug 6 '13 at 14:42
    
Unfortunate: The book is "Joan of Arc: Reality and Myth By D. E. H. de Boer, Marina Warner", which is available through google books et. al. –  Mark C. Wallace Aug 6 '13 at 14:51
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.