Take the 2-minute tour ×
History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

enter image description here

Can anyone explain the reason why a wreck of a battleship lies in the Nevada desert as it is represented in the picture above?

share|improve this question
7  
You are correct, this is a gun turret belonging to a battleship, the Space Battleship Yamato, which in its resting position is 95% buried beneath the desert floor, but when she rises, is a sight to behold. How did you manage to get this picture taken? –  Eugene Seidel Aug 16 '13 at 6:57
    
@EugeneSeidel: Awesome, I did not know they made of movie of it. Thank you!!! –  Sardathrion Aug 16 '13 at 8:11
1  
@Eugene, I was searching for The Flying Dutchman, but suddenly I came across that battleship. –  Aarão Xisto Salazar Aug 16 '13 at 8:31
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 13 down vote accepted

The reason for battleship parts lying in Nevada Desert is (from nps.gov) :

The gun barrel was taken off the Missouri during the Korean War (battleship guns were removable) when the ship was refurbished. The gun barrel was put into storage at the Naval Weapons Depot at Hawthorne, Nevada, for possible re-use aboard another battleship. But it was never remounted and lay in the Nevada desert alongside eighteen other battleship gun barrels for more then forty years

The picture above is of the gun turret converted into a sensor:

This gun turret was removed from a pre-1940s scrapped U.S. Navy Heavy Cruiser. It was developed by Lawrence Livermore Radiation Laboratory for line-of-sight diagnostics. Basically, the turret could be used on multiple atmospheric nuclear tests by rotating it and adjusting the elevation to aim at the tower cab. This eliminated the need of constructing new line-of-sight equipment for each test.

share|improve this answer
1  
And why is the Nevada desert used to store battleship parts? Because it is very, very, dry, helping to prevent rust from accumulating. –  Pieter Geerkens Aug 16 '13 at 13:03
    
The reason for this particular battleship part being in Nevada is for a completely different reason: That's where they did the nuclear testing. The bit about the gun barrel is really not directly relevant here. –  Lennart Regebro Aug 16 '13 at 14:08
2  
But +1 for finding the bit about the turret. I did wonder why they didn't use a real gun barrel. –  Lennart Regebro Aug 16 '13 at 15:27
add comment

That's not a battleship wreck. It's a naval gun turret.

Looking at the internet it's referenced as a "clean steel sensor", and has something to do with the nuclear tests in Nevada.

Although it's claimed to be German and from WWI it doesn't look like German gun turrets, it is in fact of an American type.

US gun turrets

share|improve this answer
    
Lennart, may I ask you from were that gun turret was retrieved? And why on the earth were atomic tests conducted using such an old armament? After all there were a lot of battleship wreks from WW2 that could be more productively used, included the ones owned by Americans. –  Aarão Xisto Salazar Aug 15 '13 at 23:54
    
@AarãoXistoSalazar Yes, you may ask. I have no idea where it came from. There may not have been any gun turrets from modern ships available, and even if it was it would hardly make a difference. Steel is steel. –  Lennart Regebro Aug 16 '13 at 2:38
    
The design does not conform to any WW1 or WW2 German capital ship turret I'm familiar with (and I've made some study of German ship designs of the era). To me it looks more like a coastal defense battery, or maybe something from a border fortress (which would preclude German origin as the Germans didn't use those). –  jwenting Aug 16 '13 at 5:29
    
It also clearly sits in a concrete pit and has scaffolding attached to allow easy access, making it likely it was intended to to be manned. Could indeed be a relic of nuclear testing, but if so more likely an observation post and sensor station rather than a bomb target. –  jwenting Aug 16 '13 at 5:31
1  
@jwenting There is no purpose of having a test-structure in a nuclear test unless it's reasonably close to an actual structure. Otherwise you can't assess what the damage would be. And how would they put in sensors like radiation meters inside, and check out the values after the blast, if they can't access the inside? So, your conjecture is incorrect. –  Lennart Regebro Aug 16 '13 at 8:49
show 3 more comments

That turret appears to be from the pensacola class heavy cruisers in service until 1947. Interestingly enough, both ships of this class were used in operation Crossroads and then sunk as targets in 1948.

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to the site! Unfortunately, this answer doesn't actually answer the question or cite a reference source which may help others to reach this answer. –  NotVonKaiser Mar 17 at 21:48
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.