Tag Info

New answers tagged


The Japanese were well aware of fascist ideas in the 1930s. They probably were not highly influential during this time period though. The largest reason is that fascism uses a dictator, which would negate the role of the emperor. There were few political parties and organizations that used the label of "fascist" and communism was much more popular among the ...


No. The Japanese ideology was very far from that of Nazi Germany nearly in any respect. They officially condemned racism. They declared preference to Asia over Europe. They did not express any notable anti-Semitism and anti-Slavism. That said, a lot of countries were far from democracy those times, so Japan was not an exception.


I think the comment is valid, I've always thought that shields weren't used based on the honor culture of Samuri - and considered cowardly to hide behind. Because they didn't regularly do battle with external enemies fighting could have been reputation based?


I would disagree with the other answers, which seem to suppose that some series of political events or other simple mechanic somehow miraculously led to industrialization in Japan, but not China. It's kind of asking why Japan produces higher quality economy cars than other countries. There is no easy answer. Japan and China have extremely different cultures ...


Japan was under the threat of Western imperialism and modernization was a means of escaping humiliation. Feudalistic classes had also been abolished meaning that its people now had the opportunity to pursue their own talents. Rich merchants had saved large amounts of capital which would be invested industries


Universities (at least in the US) tend to give those out to famous people as favors for lecturing there. As such, having an "honorary" degree doesn't really mean a whole lot. There wouldn't be much incentive for making up a false story about somebody receiving one. It appears he did a speaking tour of the US in 1911, and did speak at several universities, ...


You are referring to the medieval Japanese legal doctrine of kenka ryō sebai (喧嘩両成敗), literally, in quarrels, punish both sides. The prescribed punishment varied, but use of the death penalty indeed predates the Tokugawa rise to power after 1600. The earliest example is a law promulgated in April 1445 that mandated beheading. ...

Top 50 recent answers are included