New answers tagged political-history
4
By January 1964, public opinion had started to change - 68% now supported a meaningful civil rights act. President Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act in July of that year.
I'm not quite sure how to answer your first question; the syntax is very difficult, and I have no idea how to measure how many people did not oppose a measure. What I can ...
0
Once in a while I fully agree with @Anixx: there was no ban on Ukrainian language under the USSR. So the premise of the question seems to be vacuous.
Of course the issue is rather nuanced (as almost always in history):
1. Russian obviously was the top language under the USSR, without any bans.
2. In all republics of the USSR the national language was ...
1
As far as I know, modern Ukraine consists of 3 parts:
Western Ukraine,
Eastern Ukraine and
the Crimea peninsula.
Western Ukraine was part of the Austro-Hungarian empire and is therefore Pro-Western.
Eastern Ukraine was part of Russia and is therefore Pro-Russian.
The Crimea peninsula is a territory populated primarily by Russians and a large ...
0
Singapore can be considered a first world country today and is not politically/culturally influenced by European immigrants. Singapore today is mostly descended by Chinese immigrant labor as well as the local Malays. The main reason for their modern development and security is their alliance with US/Israel, as well as their strategic location.
Malaysia, ...
3
Seems like there was no "separate" Regional parties - they were merely administrative units of KPSS. From the as-of-1972 Charter of KPSS, published by Uzbekistan SSR communist party:
УСТАВ Коммунистической партии Советского Союза
Утвержден XXII съездом, частичные изменения внесены XXIII и XXIV съездами КПСС
Издательство ЦК Компартии Узбекистана, ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
