3,925 reputation
326
bio website stackoverflow.com/users/…
location London
age 23
visits member for 1 year, 7 months
seen Jul 22 at 20:53

++++++++[>+>++>+++>++++>+++++>++++++>+++++++>++++++++> +++++++++>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++++> +++++++++++++>++++++++++++++>+++++++++++++++> ++++++++++++++++<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<-]>>>>>>>>>>> -.+>>---.+++>----.++++----.++++<<<<<<<<<<.>>>>>>>>> ----.++++>-.+--.++<---.+++<<<<<<<----.++++<<.>>>>> +.-<<<<-.+>>>>>>>>>---.+++<<<<<<<<<<.>>>>>>>>>> ---.+++-.+++.--<---.+++<<<<<<<<<.>>>>>>>>>+.-> --.++>----.++++ <-.+<<<<<<<<<<.>>>>>>>>+++.---<<<<<<<<+++.---.>>>>>>>>>> ---.+++>+.-<+++.---<---.+++> ----.++++<--.++<<<<<<<<<.>>>>>>>>>>>----.++++<<.> -.+>---.+++<<-.+<>.<<<<<<<<<<<<<.


Apr
26
reviewed Approve suggested edit on Did Hitler not intend a major war while invading Poland?
Apr
26
awarded  Revival
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 13 characters in body
Apr
25
revised percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
added 553 characters in body
Apr
25
answered percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
Apr
25
comment percentage of British and American troops involved in direct combat with enemy in World War II
I keep hearing this "fact" that back then it was low (30% or so but made up statistics do tend to vary), especially in the context of it now being higher. Interesting question.
Apr
23
comment Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
The British would probably have need to capture a port for any serious attacks. The Zeebrugge Raid shows that these were not undefended.
Apr
23
comment Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
"These campaigns" is a link to Gallipoli Campaign and "wiki" was to Naval warfare of World War I. Just to be clearer this time.
Apr
23
comment Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
Ah sorry, it isn't helpful when I used ambigous markdown links.
Apr
23
revised Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
added 128 characters in body
Apr
23
answered Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
Apr
23
comment Why didn’t Britain use its vast navy to get past trench warfare?
@Luke The Admiralty didn't rate U-boats (wiki), It is a valid point though that any landing may have been contested by the German surface fleet. These campaigns can go horribly when there isn't an enemy fleet though , and when you land somewhere far less defended that Germany.
Apr
23
awarded  Nice Answer
Apr
23
comment What is the evidence for North Korean famine of 1990s?
@Sardathrion Okay, I think you're correct. I think Anixx should improve the question. Also Anixx shouldn't state false equivalences between DPRK officials and US senators. I do think a broadly similar question should exist, wikipedia is not the be all and end all and in it's citations lack a perspective from the Chinese border. Also rejecting given that the answer is contained in the citation of the wikipedia page (rather than the page itself) seems a bit harsh for this site.
Apr
23
revised What is the evidence for North Korean famine of 1990s?
added 1062 characters in body