Reputation
2,077
Top tag
Next privilege 3,500 Rep.
Protect questions
Badges
6 15
Newest
 Necromancer
Impact
~48k people reached

1d
revised When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
deleted 732 characters in body
1d
comment When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
@jwenting I see. Now the question is absolutely different. And has sense. But my answer is correct for the old content. So, I can only add info to the current.
1d
comment When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
@jwenting He is asking when they left the separate bedrooms and started to sleep in shared. But for that they had to sleep in separate ones sometimes. Somebody had seen too much pink films on "high society".
1d
comment When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
@CGCampbell youtube.com/watch?v=FQtZ_aKGcdI
1d
revised When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
added 222 characters in body
1d
comment When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
The whole question is taking on the presumption that some country the author is from is a whole world. I need not to support by references the fact of existence of the outer world. If you need them, it is the problem of your strange community. Look any document film about how usual people live in Africa, in China, in India, in Japan. Or better try to live at least a pair of years there. But the time spent in an european hotel can not be taken into account!
2d
answered When did husbands & wives start sharing bedrooms?
May
18
awarded  Necromancer
May
15
revised What changed Japanese attitude to POWs in inter-war period?
added 3 characters in body
May
12
answered What changed Japanese attitude to POWs in inter-war period?
Apr
13
comment Has a foreign power ever sought to compel another country to abide by international law by means of that country's internal judiciary?
@ihtkwot I have read your arguments. They are very weak. Too many errors. I'll mention two of them. You have forgotten that states could make an agreement that the discussions connected to some questions could be solved in some foretold court of one of these states or of some third state. And it is used. Your second great fallacy is that you don't understand that the law system of USA is not the sole one in the world.
Apr
10
comment Has a foreign power ever sought to compel another country to abide by international law by means of that country's internal judiciary?
@ihtkwot Sorry, I do not agree. Never a country really participates in the process. It could be SAID that it is a country, but always it is a government or much more often it is some much smaller official structure. In USA they call it STATE, but in other countries different language could be used. But the sense remains the same. So, a process of some official structure of one country against another official structure of another country should be enough as an example. And if you do not agree that my example will be just the case, can you provide at least SOME arguments against it?
Apr
9
comment Has a foreign power ever sought to compel another country to abide by international law by means of that country's internal judiciary?
@ihtkwot It could be. And in 1/3 of cases it will be. But in another 1/3 cases it will be the dispute between American and French state structures. The last 1/3 covers three-side disputes.
Feb
23
comment Has a foreign power ever sought to compel another country to abide by international law by means of that country's internal judiciary?
@ihtkwot I thought I have this explained... Maybe that is the problem of my English... 1. Any state has a Customs law or a set of such. And all of them have some mutual Customs Treaties. 2. Let it be USA, if you wish. If the France Ministry of Defense is buying something from Lockheed, the goods are passing the USA customs. If there is some serious misunderstanding, it is solved according to the law by the court. Where is the problem?
Feb
20
comment Has a foreign power ever sought to compel another country to abide by international law by means of that country's internal judiciary?
1. The first meaning of the world state is "country". So, of course, I meant independent states. 2. Your comment does not contain any arguments against mine, so, it is irrelevant, let alone its being a fact.
Jan
28
awarded  Yearling
Jan
8
awarded  Nice Answer
Nov
26
awarded  Nice Answer
Oct
26
revised When did the parole of prisoners of war become unacceptable?
added 86 characters in body
Oct
22
revised When did the parole of prisoners of war become unacceptable?
added 155 characters in body