| bio | website | history.stackexchange.com/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 30 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | 17 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 19 |
Systems Administrator
School district
Custom Macintosh management via BASH, AppleScript/osascript
- Fully automated Environment/Template management
- Sync systems based on specific Environment
- Deployment of updates (OS & 3rd party)
- Implement restrictions/additions based on
- Network User
- Template
- Environment
- Network
- Hardware
- Snapshot management (Server)
- Creating new Environments
- Updating old Environments
2500 Macintosh machines
- 10.4.x (NO LONGER IN USE)
- 10.5.x
- 10.6.x
- 10.7.x
- 10.8.x (IN BETA)
|
Aug 21 |
revised |
Farming societies without calendars Providing source material; added 8 characters in body |
|
Aug 21 |
answered | Farming societies without calendars |
|
Aug 21 |
revised |
Maintaining the status quo throughout the British Colonies of North America added 4 characters in body |
|
Aug 21 |
revised |
What options India had other than getting its independence from Britain? deleted 7 characters in body |
|
Aug 19 |
comment |
What caused Iranians to convert to Shiite Islam? +1 Good job providing multiple sources. |
|
Aug 19 |
comment |
Latest recorded government sanctioned use of scaphism or cyphonism (torture)? This is an interesting question. I hope someone can provide an answer. How and where did you come across Scaphism/Cyphonism? |
|
Aug 19 |
reviewed | Approve suggested edit on Why Americans like to enroll in military services despite huge risks involved? |
|
Aug 18 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? You make a very good point. Thanks for the additional information. Could you add some of this to your answer? |
|
Aug 18 |
accepted | Plagues in Pre-European Americas? |
|
Aug 18 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? The Celtic language existed in the land prior to the Old English language which would eventually replace it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_English_language This was not due to genocide either but rather assimilation. englishclub.com/english-language-history.htm Germanic tribes of the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes all spoke Englisc and the assimilation in turn created what we refer to as Old English. The irony to me is that (Norman) French did not do the same, taking English as its own. Instead it seems the opposite occurred. |
|
Aug 18 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? I don't believe this is an example of projecting modern conditions on history. The written language of Old English in fact was all but gone throughout this time period and as for the spoken language it transformed dramatically as the "French" language provided heavy influence. Perhaps this previous comment helps explain my question. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Plagues in Pre-European Americas? Welcome to History.SE and thank you for your answer. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was Khomeini in France? Who allowed him to leave and why? +1 Great answer and great job providing sources. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
When was Silver ever more valuable than Gold? @DVK +1 Before I found this site I had the same question about silver and was unable to find the answer. Great job and thanks for the source. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie Perhaps you should provide an answer rather than comment. I am only interested in gaining a better understanding to my question. Like you... I am not so interested in a debate via comment. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie That isn't true either. The Celtic language existed in the land prior to the Old English language which would eventually replace it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_English_language This was not due to genocide either but rather assimilation. englishclub.com/english-language-history.htm Germanic tribes of the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes all spoke Englisc and the assimilation in turn created what we refer to as Old English. The irony to me is that (Norman) French did not do the same, taking English as its own. Instead it seems the opposite occurred. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie. My example of Alfred the Great certainly does not represent a "modern political idea" (as this was done in the 10th century) yet he acheived his goal of promoting (promulgating) "his" code of laws/conduct. This was achievable because it was written in vernacular. Without doubt with this method, change would be slow. However, we are talking about 300 years which could easily represent 12 generations. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie Those that speak your language are easier to control/manipulate/influence. This was known prior to the Norman invasions.**Link to quote in previous comment:** en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie As for why to eliminate the English language (not "Nation"): I'll give you an example of utilizing language benefited those "in charge." Alfred the Great had a number of passages of the Bible circulated in the vernacular about 900, and in about 970 an inter-linear translation was added in red to the Lindisfarne Gospels. These included passages from the Ten Commandments and the Pentateuch, which he prefixed to a code of laws he promulgated around this time. |
|
Aug 17 |
comment |
Why was language not utilized to establish dominance throughout England 1066 AD–1360s CE? @SevenSidedDie I don't believe it is accurate to suggest that the government in the 14th century was "entirely different" as what was first implemented by William the Conquerer. Also, It seems to me that the influence of (Norman) French, or Old French, was widespread. Names of not only nobility but peasants became Old French names. |
