Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2018 at 8:28 comment added Gangnus @PieterGeerkens Yes, they did, you are right. But that is rather the question of "ineffectiveness" of the lance in 19 Cent. It worked excellently against Napoleon Army. As for 20th Cent, the cutlass WAS effective, but the lance was not already. I didn't heard of its use except for training and parades. And attention: cossacks of 20th Cent. are not dragoons, even if they could be used as such. Cossacks were much more universal. So, mentioning of dragoons on Don seems very strange by itself. Your reference is not on the subj, BTW.
Oct 25, 2018 at 8:20 history edited Gangnus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 68 characters in body
Oct 18, 2018 at 6:29 comment added Pieter Geerkens Didn't Cossacks also reintroduce the lance to European cavalry? From virtual non-existence in the early 1700's, by 1914 lance-equipped dragoons was ubiquitous from Drumheller to the Don River.
S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:18 history edited Steve Bird CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixing typos
S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:18 history suggested José Carlos Santos CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixing typos
Oct 17, 2018 at 8:05 review Suggested edits
S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:18
Oct 4, 2016 at 22:23 comment added Brasidas "Bruce Lee is weaker than a tank", I'm voting to "close this answer" because is based in unhistorical facts ;D
Sep 17, 2015 at 14:52 history edited Gangnus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 165 characters in body
Sep 17, 2015 at 8:13 history edited Gangnus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters in body
Sep 17, 2015 at 7:59 history edited Gangnus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 7 characters in body
Mar 26, 2013 at 14:59 comment added Gangnus Yes, at this time even cossack cavalry resembled later dragoons.
Mar 26, 2013 at 13:05 comment added Darek Wędrychowski Also Cossacks before 18th century were known as an excellent infantry, in opposite to weak (very light) cavalry.
Jan 28, 2012 at 22:44 history answered Gangnus CC BY-SA 3.0