Timeline for Have there been other examples of reunification/annexation, such as in the Crimea, that succeeded without using deadly force?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2015 at 1:11 | answer | added | oswana21 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 23:31 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | Arguably, this question is now moot because the Russian takeover of Crimea set in motion a Russian infiltration and meddling with in East Ukraine which has turned very bloody. So the premise is invalidated. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 13:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 7, 2014 at 23:01 | |||||
| Dec 4, 2014 at 12:56 | answer | added | March Ho | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 29, 2014 at 16:29 | answer | added | Alex | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 20:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/456528674372587520 | ||
| Apr 14, 2014 at 12:22 | vote | accept | Andrew Kloos | ||
| Apr 9, 2014 at 13:49 | answer | added | Alpedar | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 23:57 | comment | added | andy256 | Wow! There was no fighting because h the Ukrainians decided not to. Nobody sends an armed forceand expects no killing. | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 22:51 | answer | added | NL7 | timeline score: 14 | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 20:43 | answer | added | Oldcat | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 20:06 | comment | added | Andrew Kloos | I'm saying Russia took away a reason for the West to use a military option by not using deadly force. Are there other examples of this? | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 19:30 | comment | added | MCW♦ | So you're looking for examples of places where troops took over a country without killing anyone? other than Texas, Saudi Arabia, England, Zheng he in Maylaysia, perhaps the Dutch purchase of New York, and many colonial examples? | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 19:12 | comment | added | T.E.D.♦ | What is your evidence that it would have been any less successful if they had fought? If left as a bald statement like this, its going to be tough not to address that assertion. If that isn't what you want to happen, you might consider removing it. | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 18:55 | history | asked | Andrew Kloos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |