Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 14, 2017 at 13:00 comment added DevSolar The second picture reads, quote, "It is a fact that in June of 1942 the German Army tried out an utterly new type of weapon against the Russians at a location 150 kilometers southeast of Kursk. Althrough it was the entire 19th Infantry Regiment of the Russians which was thus attacked, only a few bombs (each round up to 5 kilograms) sufficed to utterly wipe them out to the last man." -- This gets a very weak smile from me. "A few" 5 kg (!!) tac-nukes, operational by 1942 and then never heard of again, when they failed to get a chain reaction even at Haigerloch?
Feb 13, 2017 at 22:43 comment added asmaier Popp 2016: "Misinterpreted Documents and Ignored Physical Facts: The History of ‘Hitler's Atomic Bomb’ needs to be corrected" (onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bewi.201601794/abstract) shows that the German physicist did not know how to build a nuclear bomb.
Sep 1, 2014 at 7:02 comment added jwenting just as interesting, they describe a hollow pit design, which the US introduced into their weapons only several years after the war, mainly because of manufacturing problems.
Jun 19, 2014 at 19:28 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 531 characters in body
Jun 19, 2014 at 19:12 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 24 characters in body
Jun 19, 2014 at 8:17 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 338 characters in body
Jun 19, 2014 at 8:11 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 338 characters in body
Jun 19, 2014 at 4:11 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 72 characters in body
Jun 19, 2014 at 4:02 history edited user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0
added further explanation of the fusion ignition process
Jun 19, 2014 at 3:53 history answered user2357 CC BY-SA 3.0