The Stack Overflow podcast is back! Listen to an interview with our new CEO.
3 added 35 characters in body
source | link

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wantedthere was less incentive for the Soviet government to "settle" Russians in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wanted to "settle" in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, there was less incentive for the Soviet government to "settle" Russians in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

2 deleted 122 characters in body
source | link

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wanted to "settle" in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

The combination of the less accessible land and national traditions allowed the Lithuanians to resist the Russians harder.

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wanted to "settle" in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

The combination of the less accessible land and national traditions allowed the Lithuanians to resist the Russians harder.

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wanted to "settle" in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

1
source | link

First, I would say that Lithuania was less colonized by the Soviet Union, meaning that we are only making a comparison with the other two.

First, Lithuania is less accessible than the other two. It has less coastline than Latvia, and much less coastline than Estonia (before World war II, most of the Soviet Baltic fleet was stationed at Talinn). Also, Lithuania has much more forest and fewer roads on the eastern (land) side; the other two lands are much flatter. Basically, fewer Russians wanted to "settle" in e.g. Lithuania's (inland) capital of Vilnius than Riga (Latvia) or Tallinn, Estonia.

Finally, Lithuania, unlike the others, had been a major power during the Middle Ages, first in its own right and second in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. On the other hand, the Latvians and Estonians, during the same period, had had the experience of living side-by-side with colonizers such as the swedes, Poles, and yes, Lithuanians, as well as the Russians.

The combination of the less accessible land and national traditions allowed the Lithuanians to resist the Russians harder.