3 edited body
source | link

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sitescites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I also found this:

Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt

The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I also found this:

Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt

The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who cites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I also found this:

Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt

The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.

2 added second source
source | link

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I also found this:

Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt

The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online

I also found this:

Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt

The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.

1
source | link

I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who sites primary sources

Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online