We’re rewarding the question askers & reputations are being recalculated! Read more.
    Post Closed as "off-topic" by Pieter Geerkens, EvanM, Mark C. Wallace, John Dallman, ihtkwot
3 Changed Question
source | link

Can anyone reword Any advice on my thesis for a professor'shistory paper prompt for meon the issue of illegal immigration in 20th Century America?

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone rewordHere is my introduction:

The notion of illegal aliens emerged in America under the Immigration Act of 1924. Previously, immigrants who were in America unofficially were given no title, and therefore were indistinguishable from the immigrants who had gone through the processes necessary for citizenship.The advent of this new class of people, illegal immigrants, ushered in simpler terms? I don't want suggestionsa new subject for my answerpolitical and social discourse and judicial decisions, I just wantand created and empowered government entities to make sure I fully understandenforce any new legislation. In twentieth-century America, the prompt before I begin writing my paperpolitical legislation and discourse legitimized racist ideas about illegal immigrants, the judicial decisions reinforced the perceived validity of these racist ideas, and ground level enforcement and social debate dispersed these ideas among the population.

-I know "racist ideas" may not be specific enough so if anyone has any advice regarding that specifically that would be awesome.

Can anyone reword a professor's paper prompt for me?

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone reword this in simpler terms? I don't want suggestions for my answer, I just want to make sure I fully understand the prompt before I begin writing my paper.

Any advice on my thesis for a history paper on the issue of illegal immigration in 20th Century America?

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Here is my introduction:

The notion of illegal aliens emerged in America under the Immigration Act of 1924. Previously, immigrants who were in America unofficially were given no title, and therefore were indistinguishable from the immigrants who had gone through the processes necessary for citizenship.The advent of this new class of people, illegal immigrants, ushered in a new subject for political and social discourse and judicial decisions, and created and empowered government entities to enforce any new legislation. In twentieth-century America, the political legislation and discourse legitimized racist ideas about illegal immigrants, the judicial decisions reinforced the perceived validity of these racist ideas, and ground level enforcement and social debate dispersed these ideas among the population.

-I know "racist ideas" may not be specific enough so if anyone has any advice regarding that specifically that would be awesome.

2 code formatting not a good choice for quotes (side scrolling)
source | link

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the
 

twentiethPrompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in

twentiethBy using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided

byYou are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone reword this in simpler terms? I don't want suggestions for my answer, I just want to make sure I fully understand itthe prompt before I begin writing my paper.

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the

twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in

twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided

by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone reword this in simpler terms? I just want to make sure I fully understand it before I begin writing my paper.

Here is the prompt:

 

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone reword this in simpler terms? I don't want suggestions for my answer, I just want to make sure I fully understand the prompt before I begin writing my paper.

1
source | link

Can anyone reword a professor's paper prompt for me?

Here is the prompt:

Prompt: In Impossible Subjects, historian Mae Ngai provides a sociolegal history of illegal immigration to the United States in the

twentieth century. Law and policy are the centers of her book, and she examines them at three levels: “in the legislative and political discourses of restriction; in judicial decisions that sought to square competing demands of sovereignty and individual rights; and in the practical articulation of the law, the everyday meanings and consequences of law that are provided by the bureaucratic state’s interactions with migrants and with other social actors (p. 12).”

By using Impossible Subjects, examine how these three levels of law and policy shaped the issues of illegal immigration in

twentieth-century America.

You are strictly prohibited from using any other external sources. Violators will be penalized. You can use factual information provided

by the lectures, but I would discourage you from relying on them. The point of the assignment is that you should fill the paper with your analysis of information and arguments provided in the Ngai’s book.

Can anyone reword this in simpler terms? I just want to make sure I fully understand it before I begin writing my paper.