Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 12, 2018 at 14:34 comment added Semaphore @Santiago Neuschwanstein is a great example of what you described. The king went into severe debts building it and his government was wildly opposed. But within years of his death it became a huge tourist attraction and a significant source of profits.
Mar 12, 2018 at 14:04 comment added Santiago Maybe building a palace (Versailles for example) would be seen as a bad economic decision, because is a waste of resources. But now, that palace is a huge tourist attraction, and probably has been an important source or revenue.
Mar 12, 2018 at 13:33 history edited Semaphore CC BY-SA 3.0
added 16 characters in body
Mar 12, 2018 at 10:46 history reopened Semaphore
Mar 12, 2018 at 10:46 history edited Semaphore CC BY-SA 3.0
added 69 characters in body; edited title
Mar 12, 2018 at 3:48 review Reopen votes
Mar 12, 2018 at 10:50
Mar 12, 2018 at 3:34 comment added sherrykidlee @ Semaphore♦ Thanks for pointing out the confusions. I just revised the question. Hopefully it clarifies what I want to ask.
Mar 12, 2018 at 3:33 history edited sherrykidlee CC BY-SA 3.0
added 189 characters in body
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:56 history closed Semaphore Needs details or clarity
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:54 answer added Andrew Brēza timeline score: 7
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:33 comment added Semaphore How are you defining "bad government intervention"? The obvious interpretation (an intervention is bad if it leads to a bad outcome) would seem to render your question a logical contradiction.
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:33 review First posts
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:52
Mar 7, 2018 at 14:28 history asked sherrykidlee CC BY-SA 3.0