Timeline for What was the process of early medieval urban development?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2013 at 15:47 | history | edited | Felix Goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Dec 23, 2013 at 13:50 | history | edited | MCW♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Dec 23, 2013 at 13:42 | comment | added | o0'. | @mgb now I'm a bit worried he could try to do that with his new pet dog... | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 13:32 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | @MarkC.Wallace It's from the PUP blurb which I linked to. | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 13:10 | comment | added | MCW♦ | Is the quote from Pirenne? it isn't clear. | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 13:01 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | @Lohoris Thanks, good point. Edit approved! | |
| S Dec 23, 2013 at 13:01 | history | suggested | o0'. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
summary of the Pirenne Thesis
|
| Dec 23, 2013 at 12:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 23, 2013 at 13:01 | |||||
| Dec 23, 2013 at 11:59 | comment | added | o0'. | Might be correct, but part of that thesis should be writte here, otherwise this is not much different from a "link only" answer... :/ | |
| Jan 1, 2013 at 19:11 | comment | added | none | @anixx - but without an emperor. Although if Berlusconi gets back in and appoints his horse to the senate ..... | |
| Jan 1, 2013 at 8:07 | comment | added | Anixx | @mgb As I know Rome is there now. | |
| Jan 1, 2013 at 3:47 | comment | added | none | @anixx - didn't there stop being a Rome around 475? | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 22:18 | comment | added | Anixx | @mgb founded in 568 it was a Roman city until 726 when the citizens rebelled and killed Roman authorities (although later it was again restored in the empire). | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 19:06 | comment | added | none | @anixx - I thought Venice was built C6 by people hiding in the swamps after Rome fell and barbarian hordes were arriving? | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 11:54 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | @Anixx: Venice is indeed Roman in foundation, but actually it fits the "old Roman fort" label not bad at all. Its first significant development belongs to the Byzantine era. | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 9:25 | comment | added | Anixx | @mgb why do you think that Venice was not Roman? | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 | comment | added | none | But are there any major medieval cities that weren't originally Roman? I can only think of Venice | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 19:55 | history | answered | Felix Goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |